Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accurate and concise description of the content of the article |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of the background, objectives, methods, principal findings, and conclusions |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Objectives |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Materials and methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethical statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions and relevant licenses |
|
|
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Study design
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of experimental and control groups |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Any steps taken to minimize the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
The experimental unit |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Experimental procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doses |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Method of administration |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Choose of dose |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental animals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origin of animal |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Species |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Sex |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Developmental stage |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Weight |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
Housing and husbandry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing |
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
Husbandry conditions |
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
Sample size
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specify the total number of animals used in each experiment |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
Explain how the number of animals was decided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocating animals to experimental groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How animals were allocated to experimental group (AZAR) |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
Experimental outcomes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly define the primary and secondary experimental outcomes assessed |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
Statistical methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Specify the unit of analysis for each dataset |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Describe any methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach |
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each experimental group, report relevant characteristics and health status of animals before treatment or testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Numbers analyzed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report the number of animals in each group included in each analysis |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
If any animals or data were not included in the analysis, explain why |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcomes and estimation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report the results for each analysis carried out |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Adverse events
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give details of all important adverse events in each experimental group |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Describe any modifications to the experimental protocols made to reduce adverse events |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation/scientific implications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpret the results, taking into account the study objectives and hypotheses, current theory, and other relevant studies in the literature |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
Comment on the study limitations including any potential sources of bias |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
Generalizability/translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comment on whether, and how, the findings of this study are likely to translate to other species or systems, including any relevance to human biology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Funding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List all funding sources |
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Results (%) |
65.7 |
40.0 |
68.6 |
62.9 |
51.4 |
57.1 |
45.7 |
54.3 |
65.7 |
57.1 |
60.0 |
57.1 |
51.4 |
65.7 |
74.3 |
68.6 |
57.1 |
62.9 |