Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jun 19;189:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.008

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of 2015–2016 NSDUH participants ages 18–49 by gender and sexual identity (n=67,354).

Male Female
Heterosexual (n=29,798) Gay (n=776) Bisexual (n=675) Heterosexual (n=32,688) Gay/Lesbian (n=743) Bisexual (n=2,674)
Age
    18–25 26.0% 30.1% 42.9% 24.2% 33.1% 47.3%
    26–34 28.7% 34.7% 27.5% 28.4% 32.6% 31.4%
    35–49 45.3% 35.1% 29.6% 47.4% 34.3% 21.3%
Race/ethnicity
    White 58.5% 57.6% 56.2% 57.4% 55.0% 61.6%
    Black 12.2% 12.1% 9.8% 13.7% 20.0% 14.9%
    Hispanic 20.5% 20.4% 24.6% 19.4% 18.3% 14.8%
    Asian 6.1% 5.5% 5.2% 6.8% 3.0% 3.5%
    Other 2.7% 4.4% 4.2% 2.7% 3.7% 5.3%
Education
    < High school 14.1% 7.5% 15.2% 10.2% 9.4% 14.1%
    High school 26.9% 20.1% 28.2% 20.3% 24.9% 27.6%
    Some college / 2 yr degree 31.5% 31.9% 33.8% 36.3% 37.0% 39.5%
    4 yr college degree 27.5% 40.5% 22.8% 33.3% 28.8% 18.9%
Urbanicity
    Large metro 56.6% 67.7% 60.9% 57.3% 55.7% 59.0%
    Small metro 29.4% 24.3% 27.4% 29.3% 31.3% 28.3%
    Non-metro 14.0% 8.0% 11.7% 13.4% 13.1% 12.7%
Employment
    Full time 69.1% 62.2% 54.6% 52.2% 58.9% 42.1%
    Part time 10.8% 15.3% 18.0% 18.7% 12.7% 21.4%
    Unemployed  7.1% 7.5% 8.3% 5.2% 7.7% 9.6%
    Other 13.0% 15.0% 19.2% 23.9% 20.6% 26.9%
Household Income
    Below federal poverty 15.7% 17.0% 21.3% 20.3% 22.1% 29.7%
    Up to 2× federal poverty 20.3% 16.5% 23.1% 21.1% 21.7% 25.7%
    More than 2× federal poverty 64.0% 66.5% 55.6% 58.7% 56.2% 44.6%
    Has health insurance 83.2% 85.4% 79.2% 88.4% 85.0% 85.8%
Overall self-reported health
    Excellent 24.7% 26.7% 17.1% 25.7% 17.3% 16.9%
    Very good 39.0% 37.3% 40.1% 38.5% 40.0% 35.3%
    Good  27.9% 28.7% 30.0% 26.6% 29.2% 30.5%
    Fair/poor 8.4% 7.2% 12.9% 9.2% 13.5% 17.4%
Marital status
    Married 44.8% 9.4% 22.5% 47.9% 16.2% 25.9%
    Widowed 1.1% 2.2% 3.2% 1.3% 2.1% 2.1%
    Divorced/separated 9.2% 5.3% 5.7% 12.3% 10.7% 11.9%
    Never married 45.0% 83.1% 68.6% 38.5% 71.0% 60.2%
Household Size
    1 7.8% 17.6% 7.6% 5.4% 10.5% 5.7%
    2 19.9% 39.0% 26.6% 19.9% 34.2% 24.0%
    3 23.1% 19.5% 23.7% 22.6% 25.3% 23.4%
    4 25.4% 12.5% 16.6% 26.5% 16.2% 24.0%
    5 14.1% 5.1% 14.0% 14.7% 6.5% 11.7%
    6+ 9.6% 6.2% 11.4% 10.9% 7.3% 11.1%
Respondent’s children <18 in household
    0 59.4% 94.7% 79.3% 45.1% 74.5% 59.9%
    1 15.0% 2.9% 9.1% 21.2% 14.6% 19.0%
    2 15.9% 1.2% 8.5% 21.3% 8.1% 13.3%
    3+ 9.7% 1.2% 3.1% 12.5% 2.8% 7.9%

Note: Demographic differences were compared across subgroups using Pearson chi-square tests based on weighted frequencies, corrected for survey design. When comparing across all six subgroups, chi-square tests were significant at the 0.05 level for all variables. Additionally, we conducted chi-square tests to compare sexual identity groups within gender. For men, differences were statistically significant for all variables except race/ethnicity and health insurance. For women, differences were statistically significant for all variables except urbanicity.