Skip to main content
MedChemComm logoLink to MedChemComm
. 2017 Oct 9;8(11):2125–2132. doi: 10.1039/c7md00415j

Cu(ii), Ga(iii) and In(iii) complexes of 2-acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone: synthesis, spectral characterization and biological activities

Yu-Ting Wang a,b, Yan Fang a, Meng Zhao a, Ming-Xue Li a,, Yu-Mei Ji a, Qiu-Xia Han a,
PMCID: PMC6084159  PMID: 30108730

graphic file with name c7md00415j-ga.jpgThe complexes possess effective antibacterial activity and considerable cytotoxicity against HepG2 cells. In addition, the indium(iii) complex exhibits excellent photoluminescence properties.

Abstract

In this paper, synthesis and characterization of metal complexes [Cu2(L)3]ClO4 (1), [Ga(L)2]NO3·2H2O (2) and [In(L)2]NO3·H2O (3) (HL = 2-acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone) was carried out, including elemental analysis, spectral analysis (IR, UV-vis, NMR), and X-ray crystallography. Complex 1 contains one S-bridged binuclear [Cu2(L)3]+ unit, where two Cu atoms display diverse coordination geometries: one being square planar geometry and the other octahedral geometry. Both 2 and 3 are mononuclear complexes, and the metal centers in 2 and 3 are chelated by two NNS tridentate ligands possessing a distorted octahedral geometry. Biological studies show that all the complexes possess a wide spectrum of modest to effective antibacterial activities and remarkable cytotoxicities against HepG2 cells, and 1, in particular, with an IC50 value of 0.19 ± 0.06 μM, is 113-fold and 28-fold more cytotoxic than HL and the antitumor drug mitoxantrone, respectively. In addition, 3 exhibits excellent photoluminescence properties. Upon the addition of 1 equiv of In3+ ions, a remarkable fluorescence intensity of HL and fluorescent color change (from transparent to light-green) could be observed with 365 nm light, indicating that this ligand may be used as a promising colorimetric and fluorescent probe for In3+ detection.

1. Introduction

Thiosemicarbazones are a significant family of Schiff bases not only in terms of their coordination capacity, but their analytical, biological and pharmacological properties.16 In the past several years, many metal compounds have been derived from thiosemicarbazones. For example, Yang et al. proposed the use of a metal pro-drug whose design is based on the natural HSA IIA subdomain and the known cancer cell to improve the anti-cancer activity and selectivity of drugs.711 In addition, as versatile ligands, they also have the ability to provide diverse binding sites for metal ions to form stable metal complexes, which allows them to be used in biological and environmental samples for the selective extraction and detection of certain vital metal ions.2,4 For example, some fluorescence and colorimetric sensors based on thiosemicarbazones have been designed to identify metal ions which are reactive and toxic in biology e.g., Cu2+, Hg2+ and In3+.5,6,12,13 Among thiosemicarbazones with excellent biological activities,2,1416 the most outstanding representative of this family is 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Triapine), which is a potent inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase and employed in phase I and II clinical tests for treatment of a variety of malignancies at present.17,18 Though the mechanisms involved in the biological activities of thiosemicarbazones are controversial in many ways to date, it is well-accepted that the biological activities are also intensely connected to their ability to form complexes with metals.3,14 Lipophilicity, which dominates the rate of molecules entering cells, may be improved through complexing.19,20 Moreover, in many cases the metal complex may display higher bioactivities than free ligands and certain side effects likely decline via complexing.2123 Hence the synthesis and application of thiosemicarbazones and their complexes have attracted continuous interest and become one of the most promising research areas. Copper(ii) is a biologically essential ion whose redox potential permits its participation in electron transfer reactions of cellular processes.24 Cu(ii)–thiosemicarbazone complexes have drawn more attention owing to their diversity of structures and fascinating biological activities, especially their anticancer activity.2527 In recent years, they have been also expanded into other fields such as therapy for neurodegenerative diseases and radiopharmaceutials.2729 Gallium(iii) is the second metal ion applied for tumor therapy after platinum(ii).30 Complexation of gallium(iii) with thiosemicarbazones could enhance the bioactivity of Ga(iii), and was considered as an important strategy to develop cytotoxic drugs.3137 Indium(iii) is an Auger electron emitter, which enables its complexes to be potential dual imaging-therapeutic agents.37 Nevertheless, reports on indium(iii) thiosemicarbazone complexes are quite rare.1,3740

As a continuation of our study on heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones as well as their complexes,16,4044 we showed three metal complex derivatives of 2-acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone (HL, Scheme 1) in this paper, namely, [Cu2(L)3]ClO4 (1), [Ga(L)2]NO3·2H2O (2) and [In(L)2]NO3·H2O (3), and also discussed a series of characterizations and biological activities of these complexes. An investigation of the luminescence characteristics of these compounds has been performed. Moreover, the antibacterial activity and cytotoxic activity of HL and 1–3 have been investigated against eight selected kinds of bacteria and the HepG2 cell line, respectively.

Scheme 1. 2-Acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone, HL.

Scheme 1

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The ligand HL was acquired on the basis of the method reported in the literature45 and verified through analyzing the IR spectra. The structures of all the compounds obtained were confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Fig. 1–3 depict the structure of molecules as well as the atomic number scheme and the packed unit cell, respectively.

Fig. 1. Molecular structure of 1, showing the binuclear [Cu2(L)3]+ unit. For clarity, the hydrogen atoms are omitted.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2. (a) Molecular structure of 2. For clarity, the hydrogen atoms are omitted. (b) Molecular structure of 3. Hydrogen atoms are omitted.

Fig. 2

Fig. 3. UV-vis absorption spectra of the HL and 1–3 in methanol solution at room temperature.

Fig. 3

2.1.1. Crystal structure of 1

Complex 1 is composed of one S-bridged dinuclear [Cu2(L)3]+ cation and one free perchlorate counteranion (Fig. 1). In the [Cu2(L)3]+ cation, two copper atoms are located in different coordination environments. Cu1 is four-coordinated with one ligand as monobasic tridentate (N3, N4, S1) forming two 5-membered fused chelate rings, and the sulfur atom (S2) of another ligand occupies the fourth site. The coordination geometry around the central Cu1 atom could be depicted as slightly distorted square planar with a parameter τ = 0.178 {τ = [360 – (α + β)]/141, where α = N3–Cu1–S2 = 175.4(3)°, β = N4–Cu1–S1 = 159.5(3)° and τ = 0 and 1 for regular square planar and tetrahedral geometries, respectively}.46 The Cu2 atom exhibits a contorted N4S2 octahedral geometry. The basal plane is composed of two nitrogen atoms (N7, N8) and the sulfur atom (S2) from the same ligand together with an imine nitrogen atom (N11) from the second ligand, whereas the axial sites are occupied by a sulfur atom (S3) and pyridine nitrogen (N12) from the second ligand. The bond length of Cu–N ranges from 1.951(10) to 2.226(10) Å, while the Cu–S distances are in the range of 2.274(4)–2.708(4) Å. The Cu1···Cu2 distance inside the dimeric unit is 3.540(24) Å, similar to those in μ2-thiolate bridged Cu(ii) dimers.4757

Noticeably, three deprotonated ligands in the [Cu2(L)3]+ cation display two kinds of coordination modes: two ligands coordinate to two Cu atoms in an expected N2S tridentate manner, while the last one serves as a tetradentate donor with two N atoms (pyridine N atom, imine N atom) adopting a normal chelating mode and S bridging mode (μ2) linking two metal centers. The C–S distances range between 1.738(13) and 1.767(12) Å, being within the normal range of a C–S single bond, indicating that the ligands are coordinated in their deprotonated thiolate form.58 Such a structure of the [Cu2(L)3] dimeric unit is unique and more interesting since the stoichiometry of metal : thiosemicarbazone ligand is 2 : 3 and two copper(ii) ions show different chelating modes with bridging S atoms to form a square-planar/octahedral complex (4 : 6-coordination), as compared with those of reported Cu(ii)–thiosemicarbazone dimers,4757 where the stoichiometry of metal : thiosemicarbazone is 1 : 1 and two Cu centers both have the same 5-coordinated square-pyramidal topology. In addition, the crystal structure is stabilized by the linking of the different components of intermolecular hydrogen bonds of 1 (Fig. S1 in the ESI). The hydrogen bond contains the terminal nitrogen atom N5 and sulfur atom S2 with N5···S2 equal to 3.501(11) Å, and the angle N5–H5A···S2 being 150.7° (symmetry code: x + 1, y + 2, z), respectively.

2.1.2. Crystal structures of 2 and 3

Complexes 2 and 3 have similar structures (Fig. 2), thus only 2 was described in detail. As depicted in Fig. 2a, 2 consists of one [Ga(L)2]+ cation, one nitrate ion and two water molecules. Two tridentate (N, N, S) anionic ligands put the Ga(iii) ion in a distorted octahedral polyhedron as found in similar Ga(III) 2-acetylpyridine thiosemicarbazones complexes.37,5962 The pyridine nitrogen atoms are mutually in a cis position to each other and trans to sulfur atoms, whereas the imine nitrogen atoms are in a trans position to each other. The N8–Ga–S2, N4–Ga–S1 and N3–Ga–N7 angles, 155.70(13)°, 155.44(12)° and 176.75(15)°, deviate from the ideal value of 180° obviously, indicating distortion from the geometry of a conventional octahedron. The bond lengths between gallium and pyridine nitrogen (2.104(4) and 2.105(4) Å) are slightly longer than those of gallium and imine nitrogen (2.062(4) and 2.065(4) Å), which may be attributed to the fact that the imine nitrogen is a stronger base compared with the pyridine nitrogen.58 Two measured C–S bond distances (1.749(5) and 1.708(5) Å) suggest that thiosemicarbazone moieties adopt a form of tautomeric thiol and serve as negative ligands.58

In the crystal packing of 2, two kinds of intermolecular hydrogen bonds occur containing the terminal nitrogen atoms N1 and N5, O1W of the water molecule and O1 of the nitrate ion (Fig. S2). The separation for N1···O1W is 3.157(9) Å with the N1–H1A···O1W angle being 169.4° and the separation for N5···O1 (symmetry code: x – 1, y, z) is 3.014(9) Å with the N5–H5A···O1 angles being 167.2°, respectively. Unlike those of 2, three kinds of intermolecular hydrogen bonds are formed involving N1 and N5 of the ligand and N9 and O1 of the nitrate ion in 3, and the lattice water molecule is not involved in the hydrogen bond formation (Fig. S2). The N1and N5 atoms from the ligand serve as hydrogen bond donors, whereas the oxygen atom O1 and nitrogen atom N9 of the nitrate ion serve as acceptors with N1···O1 equal to 2.880(7) Å and the angle N1–H1A···O1 being 158.8° (symmetry code: –x, y – 1/2, –z + 1/2), N5···O1 equal to 3.037(8) Å and the angle N5–H5A···O1 being 156.9° and N(5)···N(9) equal to 3.428(9) Å and the angle N5–H5B···N(9) being 170.2°, respectively. These hydrogen bond interactions link [In(L)2]+ units in the crystal cell giving rise to a 1D zigzag chain along the b axis and further stabilize the structure of 3 (Fig. S2).

2.2. IR spectra

Infrared characteristic absorption peaks of the complexes are usually different from those of the free ligand and can offer important information on ligand bonding. For thiosemicarbazones and their complexes, the bonding vibration of v(C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 N), v(N–N), and v(C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 S) has been given more attention in the IR spectrum. In the IR spectrum of the ligand, the v(C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 N) band appears at 1581 cm–1 and moves to 1596–1599 cm–1 in complexes 1–3, indicating that the imine nitrogen participated in the coordination.31,63 Meanwhile, the increases in the wavenumber of v(N–N) from 1068 cm–1 in HL to 1156, 1160 and 1157 cm–1 in 1–3 may be attributed to the enhancement in bond strength, further proving the coordination of imine nitrogen. The strong band at 801 cm–1 in HL is due to v(C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 S) of the thione form in the solid state, and this band moves to lower wavenumbers at 746, 759, and 764 cm–1 in 1–3, respectively. The stretching band at 1263 cm–1 [ν(CS) + ν(CN)] shifted to 1252, 1252 and 1253 cm–1 for 1–3, respectively. These characteristic shifts indicate the thione–thiol tautomerism of the coordinated thiosemicarbazone.6365

2.3. UV-vis spectra

The UV-vis absorption behaviors of these compounds are determined in methanol solution. As depicted in Fig. 3, the ligand HL gives only one band at 318 nm in the ultraviolet region, which can be attributable to the π–π* transition; and complexes 1–3 exhibit one weak band in the ultraviolet region (311, 304, and 303 nm for 1–3, respectively) and one strong band in the visible region (406, 405 and 403 nm for 1–3, respectively). Therefore, the bands in the range 303–311 nm for the three complexes, which are only blue-shifts of 7–15 nm relative to the ligand, might be attributed to the intra ligand transition. Meanwhile, the intense bands at 406, 405, and 403 nm for 1–3 are obviously different from that of the ligand, and accordingly may be assigned to the LMCT transitions. Such a characteristic provides obvious evidence for the ligand chelating the metal center.

2.4. Fluorescence properties

The fluorescence behaviors of HL and 1–3 were investigated at room temperature in 1 × 10–5 M methanol solutions. Fluorescence experiments were carried out with 260 nm as the excitation wavelength for HL, 2 and 3, and 234 nm as the excitation wavelength for 1, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4, free ligand HL and 1–3 all exhibit two similar peaks: one strong peak at ca. 306 nm and one weak peak at ca. 586 nm, which indicates that these emissions should be ascribed to intra ligand fluorescence emission. In addition, 3 displays a noticeable enhancement in emission intensity while 2 and 1 show a slight change or decrease in emission intensity compared with the free ligand. These observations indicate that the differences between the central metal ion and its coordination environment may have significant effects on the emission intensity.66

Fig. 4. Fluorescence properties of HL and 1–3 in methanol solution at room temperature.

Fig. 4

Based on the better fluorescence behavior of 3, fluorescence titration experiments for the binding of HL (1.0 × 10–5 M) with In3+ were further carried out in methanol solution. Fig. 5a shows the fluorescence spectral changes of HL with increasing amount of In3+. Upon the addition of 0.125–1 equiv. of In3+, the emission intensity of HL increases efficiently. The highest peaks at 306 nm and 586 nm are at least four times as intense as the corresponding band in HL solution without In3+. Moreover, the fluorescence response of HL with In3+ can also be observable by the naked eye using a UV lamp (365 nm) (Fig. 5b), indicating that this ligand may be used as a promising colorimetric and fluorescent probe for In3+ detection.

Fig. 5. (a) Fluorescence behavior of HL in the presence and absence of In3+ (methanol solvent) at λex = 260 nm and a concentration of 1.0 × 10–5 M HL. Inset: changes in the emission intensity at 306 nm and 586 nm with increasing amount of In3+. (b) Observation of the visual changes for HL in the presence of different amounts of In3+ under a UV lamp (365 nm).

Fig. 5

2.5. Biological activity studies

The biological activities of the obtained compounds were detected on the basis of antibacterial activity and cytotoxic activity in comparison to HL.

2.5.1. Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial activity of HL, compounds 1–3, standard antibiotic Kan (kanamycin sulfate) and the solvent (10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) was tested by using four strains of Gram positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Sarcina lutea) and four strains of Gram negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa). The data concerning the zone of inhibition (zoi) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The results reveal that HL and 1–3 possess a wide spectrum of modest to effective antibacterial activities ranging from 8 to 25 mm zoi against almost all the tested microorganisms. At the same time, it can be seen from Tables 1 and 2 that, in general, compounds 1–3 show much higher antibacterial activity with increased zoi and decreased MICs as compared to HL. For instance, 1–3 show zoi ranging 10–21 mm and MICs ranging 62.5–500 μg mL–1 against B. subtilis, while HL shows lower activity with 8 mm zoi and 1000 μg mL–1 MICs against B. subtilis. And in the case of P. aeruginosa, 1–3 display activity in the range 8–17 mm zoi and 62.5–250 μg mL–1 MICs; however, HL is found to be inactive under the same experimental conditions. Particularly, of the three compounds, 2 exhibits the maximum activity against P. aeruginosa with 17 mm zoi and the lowest MIC value of 62.5 μg mL–1, better than the positive control antibiotic Kan (zoi: 16 mm; MIC: 250 μg mL–1). A possible explanation for the increased activity of the obtained compounds relative to the ligand is that they have a better membrane penetrating ability endowed by their increased lipophilicity upon complexation.67 These results suggest that the coordination of thiosemicarbazones to metals has a synergetic effect on the antibacterial activity and the antibacterial activity is also closely relevant to the type of metal ion.

Table 1. Diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) of the tested compounds (1 mg mL–1).
Microorganism Diameter of inhibition zone
HL 1 2 3 Solvent Kan
B. subtilis 8 12 21 10 a 27
B. cereus 8 8 10 8 15
S. aureus 12 8 25 16 19
S. lutea 8 10 12 16
A. tumefaciens 8 8 11 10 32
E. coli 8 8 13 8 17
P. aeruginosa 8 17 10 16
S. typhimurium 8 12 8 18

aNo inhibition or d < 8 mm. Solvent: 10% DMSO in PBS.

Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (μg mL–1) of the tested compounds.
Microorganism MIC (μg mL–1)
HL 1 2 3 Solvent Kan
B. subtilis 1000 62.5 125 500 a 15.63
B. cereus 1000 125 250 1000 250
S. aureus 250 125 62.5 125 15.63
S. lutea 1000 250 125 1000
A. tumefaciens 1000 500 250 500 15.63
E. coli 1000 500 250 1000 250
P. aeruginosa 125 62.5 125 250
S. typhimurium 1000 250 1000 500

aNo inhibition or MIC > 1000 μg mL–1. Solvent: 10% DMSO in PBS.

2.5.2. Cytotoxic activity

Human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells were applied to evaluate the anti-proliferative activities of these compounds. Mitoxantrone (a kind of antitumor drug) was employed as the reference compound for comparison. IC50 values (compound concentration that induces death of 50% of cells) in micromolar units are calculated and represented in Fig. 6. It can be clearly observed that compounds 1–3 have shown a significant inhibitory potency against the proliferation of HepG2 cells at a low concentration (IC50 = 0.19 ± 0.06 μM, 3.25 ± 0.78 μM, and 3.33 ± 0.21 μM for 1–3, respectively). More importantly, the cytotoxic effects of the three compounds are significantly improved compared with HL (IC50 = 21.55 ± 2.41 μM) and even greater than that of mitoxantrone (5.3 ± 2.38 μM). Particularly, 1 is the most active compound in this study and is 113-fold and 28-fold more cytotoxic than HL and mitoxantrone, respectively. In general, the compounds studied in this paper were endowed with important biological activity and would be good candidates as anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agents.

Fig. 6. Cytotoxic effects of these compounds against HepG2 cells. All data are presented as the mean ± SD from three separate measurements.

Fig. 6

3. Conclusions

In summary, the copper(ii), gallium(iii) and indium(iii) complexes based on 2-acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone have been synthesized and characterized. These compounds display a wide spectrum of modest to effective antibacterial activities and possess considerable cytotoxicity against the HepG2 cancer cell line, higher than mitoxantrone. In3+ determination using 2-acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone has been carried out by fluorescence spectrometry, and the result shows that this ligand may be used as a promising colorimetric and fluorescent probe for In3+ detection. The results of this study are of great significance to broaden the applications of thiosemicarbazone derivatives in the fields of fluorescent and colorimetric probes.

4. Experimental

4.1. Materials and chemicals

All reagents and solvents used in this study were of reagent grade and used without further purification. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were performed on a Perkin-Elmer 240 analyzer. The IR spectrum was recorded on a Nicolet FT-IR 360 spectrometer using KBr pellets in the range of 4000–400 cm–1. The UV-vis absorption spectra were collected using a TU-1900 spectrometer. The fluorescence emission spectra were collected using a HITACHI F-7000 model instrument at room temperature. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker AV-400 spectrometer in DMSO-d6.

4.2. Synthesis

4.2.1. Synthesis of HL45

4.2.2. Synthesis of the complexes

General synthetic strategy for compounds 1–3

The metal salt was dissolved in methanol solution in a separate beaker (Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.074 g, 0.2 mmol) for 1; Ga(NO3)3·6H2O (0.073 g, 0.2 mmol) for 2; In(NO3)3·5H2O (0.078 g, 0.2 mmol) for 3). The solution of metal salt was added dropwise to a reaction mixture of 2-acetylpyridine N(4)-phenylthiosemicarbazone (HL) and NaOAc under continuous stirring (HL (0.081 g, 0.3 mmol), NaOAc (0.025 g, 0.3 mmol) for 1; HL (0.108 g, 0.4 mmol), NaOAc (0.032 g, 0.4 mmol) for 2 and 3, respectively). Then the mixture was stirred for 1 h and filtered after cooling to room temperature. The crude product was further recrystallized using methanol solution and dried over P4O10in vacuo. By slowly evaporating the methanol solution, single crystals for X-ray studies were acquired.

[Cu2(L)3]ClO4 (1)

Yield: 61%. Anal. calcd for C42H40ClCu2N12O4S3 (1): C, 48.71; H, 3.89; N,16.23. Found: C, 48.79; H, 3.72; N, 16.15. IR [KBr, ν (cm–1)]: 3296 (NH), 1599 (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 N), 1156 (N–N), 746 (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 S).

[Ga(L)2]NO3·2H2O (2)

Yield: 68%. Anal. calcd for C28H30GaN9O5S2 (2): C, 47.60; H, 4.28; N, 17.84. Found: C, 47.73; H, 4.35; N, 17.91. 1H NMR(DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 10.20 (s, 1H, NH), 8.31 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Py), 8.24 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Py), 8.04 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, Py), 7.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.61 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H, Ph), 7.32 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.04 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Py), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3); IR [KBr, ν (cm–1)]: 3246 (NH), 1598(C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 N), 1160 (N–N), 759 (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 S).

[In(L)2]NO3·H2O (3)

Yield: 71%. Anal. calcd for C28H28InN9O4S2 (3): C, 45.85; H, 3.85; N, 17.19. Found: C, 45.91; H, 3.81; N, 17.26. 1H NMR(DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 10.23 (s, 1H, NH), 8.31–8.29 (m, 2H, Py), 8.13 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, Py), 7.83 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.74–7.71 (m, 1H, Ph), 7.40 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.10 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Py), 2.87 (s, 3H, CH3); IR [KBr, ν (cm–1)]: 3254 (NH), 1596 (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 N), 1157 (N–N), 764 (C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 S).

4.3. Crystallography

Single crystals of 1 (0.62 × 0.27 × 0.10 mm), 2 (0.42 × 0.40 × 0.24 mm), and 3 (0.68 × 0.52 × 0.26 mm) were selected for collecting crystallographic data. A Siemens SMART-CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) was used to collect the crystallographic data. The crystal structures of these complexes were worked out by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 with anisotropic displacement parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms using SHELXTL.68 The hydrogen atoms were added at idealized geometrical positions.

4.4. Fluorescence measurements

The preparation of HL, In(NO3)3·5H2O, and 1–3 (1 × 10–4 mol L–1) solutions was performed in methanol. Then the solutions of HL and 1–3 were diluted to 1 × 10–5 mol L–1. HL (1 mL, 10–4 mol L–1) and appropriate amounts of In3+ (0, 125, 250, 500, 750, 1000 μL) were put in a volumetric flask (10 mL), and then diluted to 10 mL with methanol for a concentration gradient experiment. The excitation wavelength used in this experiment was 234 nm for 1 and 260 nm for HL, 2 and 3, respectively and the emission wavelength was acquired from 250 nm to 800 nm.

4.5. Biological experiments

4.5.1. Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial activity was evaluated against the standard strains of several representative Gram positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Sarcina lutea) and Gram negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa). All germs were obtained from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC). The basic culture medium for the organisms was prepared using a Muller Hinton Agar. The sensitivity of the different bacterial strains to the different compounds was measured in terms of zone of inhibition by the disk diffusion method.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured through an agar dilution method. The ultimate concentration of all nutrients in MHA was set at 106 CFU mL–1 and applied for inoculation in the MIC experiment. Serial dilutions of the tested compounds dissolved in PBS containing 10% DMSO were set at concentrations of 0–2000 μg mL–1. Each plate was inoculated with 0.1 ml of bacterial culture medium. An empty disk, only including 10% DMSO in the center at each plate, served as negative control and kanamycin sulfate (Kan) as positive control. All inoculated plates were cultivated at 37 °C for 18–20 h. The MICs were determined as the minimum concentration of agents in the plate for which no marked growth occurred at the macro level. All results and data were obtained from at least three independent experiments.

4.5.2. Cytotoxicity test

The cell cytotoxicity was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. A 96-well plate at a cell density of 1 × 104 cells per well was applied to plate cells in a CO2 incubator. The nutrient solution with MTT was changed and displaced with a fresh medium after 24 h. The tested compounds were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at 0.01 M. Before the test, the solution was diluted to different concentrations with PBS, and the terminal concentration of DMSO is less than 1%. After a culture cycle of 24 h, the cells were allowed to grow in a 100 μL solution containing 10 μL of 5 mg mL–1 MTT for 4 h at 37 °C. The nutrient solution with MTT was changed, and each well was displaced with 100 μL DMSO to dissolve the formazan. A microplate reader (Bio-Tek ELX800, USA) was used to measure the absorbance at 570 nm. The inhibitory rates of the compounds in different concentrations were calculated, and the IC50 value was measured.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21671055, 21601048).

Footnotes

†Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: All experimental data have been deposited in the ESI. CCDC numbers 939604–939606 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for 1–3. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7md00415j

References

  1. Jagadeesh M., Kalangi S. K., Krishna L. S., Reddy A. V. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2014;118:552–556. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.08.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lobana T. S., Sharma R., Bawa G., Khanna S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009;253:977–1055. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferraz K. O., Wardell S. M. S. V., Wardell J. L., Louro S. R. W., Beraldo H. Spectrochim. Acta Part A. 2009;73:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed S. A. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;156:521–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Park H., Chang S. K. Sens. Actuators, B. 2015;220:376–380. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang C., Gao B., Zhang Q., Zhang G., Shuang S., Dong C. Talanta. 2016;154:278–283. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.03.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Qi J. X., Zhang Y., Gou Y., Zhang Z. L., Zhou Z. P., Wu X. Y., Yang F., Liang H. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2016;13:1501–1507. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Qi J. X., Gou Y., Zhang Y., Yang K., Chen S. F., Liu L., Wu X. Y., Wang T., Zhang W., Yang F. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:7497–7511. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gou Y., Qi J., Ajayi J. P., Zhang Y., Zhou Z., Yang F., Liang H. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2015;12:3597–3609. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang Y., Ho A., Yue J., Kong L., Zhou Z., Wu X., Yang F., Liang H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;86:449–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.08.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gou Y., Yang F., Liang H. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016;16:996–1000. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150825142908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Suganya S., Zo H. J., Park J. S., Velmathi S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014;53:9561–9569. [Google Scholar]
  13. Che Y. Y., Wu D. L., Deng C. M., Liu L., Jia D. Z. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016;644:171–175. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang X. M., Guo H., Li Z. S., Song F. H., Wang W. M., Dai H. Q., Zhang L. X., Wang J. G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;101:419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Opletalová V., Kalinowski D. S., Vejsová M., Kuneš J., Pour M., Jampílek J., Buchta V., Richardson D. R. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008;21:1878–1889. doi: 10.1021/tx800182k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li M. X., Chen C. L., Ling C. S., Zhou J., Ji B. S., Wu Y. J., Niu J. Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:2704–2706. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pape V. F. S., Tóth S., Füredi A., Szebényi K., Lovrics A., Szabó P., Wiese M., Szakács G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;117:335–354. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.03.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu Y., Wong J., Lovejoy D. B., Kalinowski D. S., Richardson D. R. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:6876–6883. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chang Y. H., Chen C. Y., Singh G., Chen H. Y., Liu G. C., Goan Y. G., Aime S., Wang Y. M. Inorg. Chem. 2011;50:1275–1287. doi: 10.1021/ic101799c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh S., Bharti N., Mohapatra P. P. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:1900–1947. doi: 10.1021/cr068217k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maia P. I. D., Nguyen H. H., Ponader D., Hagenbach A., Bergemann S., Gust R., Deflon V. M., Abram U. Inorg. Chem. 2012;51:1604–1613. doi: 10.1021/ic201905t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kovala-Demertzi D., Papageorgiou A., Papathanasis L., Alexandratos A., Dalezis P., Miller J. R., Demertzis M. A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44:1296–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chellan P., Land K. M., Shokar A., Au A., An S. H., Clavel C. M., Dyson P. J., de Kock C., Smith P. J., Chibale K., Smith G. S. Organometallics. 2012;31:5791–5799. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raja D. S., Paramaguru G., Bhuvanesh N. S. P., Reibenspies J. H., Renganathan R., Natarajan K. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:4548–4559. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01657h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. West D. X., Liberta A. E., Padhye S. B., Chikate R. C., Sonawane P. B., Kumbhar A. S., Yerande R. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1993;123:49–71. [Google Scholar]
  26. Palanimuthu D., Shinde S. V., Somasundaram K., Samuelson A. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:722–734. doi: 10.1021/jm300938r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paterson B. M., Donnelly P. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3005–3018. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00215a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hickey J. L., Crouch P. J., Mey S., Caragounis A., White J. M., White A. R., Donnelly P. S. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:1338–1347. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01176b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hickey J. L., Lim S. C., Hayne D. J., Paterson B. M., White J. M., Villemagne V. L., Roselt P., Binns D., Cullinane C., Jeffery C. M., Price R. I., Barnham K. J., Donnelly P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:16120–16132. doi: 10.1021/ja4057807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Collery P., Keppler B., Madoulet C., Desoize B. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2002;42:283–296. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00225-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. da Silva J. G., Azzolini L. S., Wardell S. M. S. V., Wardell J. L., Beraldo H. Polyhedron. 2009;28:2301–2305. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kowol C. R., Eichinger R., Jakupec M. A., Galanski M., Arion V. B., Keppler B. K. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007;101:1946–1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mendes I. C., Soares M. A., dos Santos R. G., Pinheiro C., Beraldo H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44:1870–1877. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kowol C. R., Berger R., Eichinger R., Roller A., Jakupec M. A., Schmidt P. P., Vladimir B., Keppler B. K. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:1254–1265. doi: 10.1021/jm0612618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kumar K., Schniper S., González-Sarrías A., Holder A. A., Sanders N., Sullivan D., Jarrett W. L., Davis K., Bai F., Seeram N. P., Kumar V. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;86:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.08.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mendes I. C., Soares M. A., dos Santos R. G., Pinheiro C., Beraldo H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44:1870–1877. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chan J., Thompson A. L., Jones M. W., Peach J. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2010;363:1140–1149. [Google Scholar]
  38. Abram S., Maichle-Mössmer C., Abram U. Polyhedron. 1998;17:131–143. [Google Scholar]
  39. Paek C., Kang S. O., Ko J., Carroll P. J. Organometallics. 1997;16:4755–4758. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tai Y. X., Ji Y. M., Lu Y. L., Li M. X., Wu Y. Y., Han Q. X. Synth. Met. 2016;219:109–114. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Y. K., Yang M., Li M. X., Yu H., Wu H. C., Xie S. Q. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;23:2288–2292. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li M. X., Lu Y. L., Yang M., Li Y. K., Zhang L. Z., Xie S. Q. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:2882–2887. doi: 10.1039/c2dt31256e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li M. X., Chen C. L., Zhang D., Niu J. Y., Ji B. S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010;45:3169–3177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang N., Tai Y. X., Li M. X., Ma P. T., Zhao J. W., Niu J. Y. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:5182–5189. doi: 10.1039/c4dt00077c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Klayman D. L., Bartosevich J. F., Daniel T. S., Klayman L., Bartosevich J. F., Griffin T. S., Mason C. J., Scovill J. P. J. Med. Chem. 1979;22:855–862. doi: 10.1021/jm00193a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hosseini-Yazdi S. A., Hosseinpour S., Khandar A. A., Kassel W. S., Piro N. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2015;427:124–130. [Google Scholar]
  47. Raja D. S., Bhuvanesh N. S. P., Natarajan K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011;46:4584–4594. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu Y. H., Li A., Shao J., Xie C. Z., Song X. Q., Bao W. G., Xu J. Y. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:8036–8049. doi: 10.1039/c6dt00451b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lobana T. S., Khanna S., Butcher R. J. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:4845–4851. doi: 10.1039/c2dt30068k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pedrido R., Romero M. J., Bermejo M. R., Martínez-Calvo M., González-Noy A. M., Zaragoza G. Dalton Trans. 2009:8329–8340. doi: 10.1039/b908782f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Naskar S., Naskar S., Mayer-Figge H., Sheldrick W. S., Corbella M., Tercero J., Chattopadhyay S. K. Polyhedron. 2012;35:77–86. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jayakumar K., Sithambaresan M., Aiswarya N., Kurup M. R. P. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2015;139:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gupta S., Pal S., Barik A. K., Hazra A., Roy S., Mandal T. N., Peng S. M., Lee G. H., Fallah M. S., Tercero J., Kar S. K. Polyhedron. 2008;27:2519–2528. [Google Scholar]
  54. Qi J. X., Liang S. C., Gou Y., Zhang Z. L., Zhou Z. P., Yang F., Liang H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;96:360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gómez-Saiz P., García-Tojal J., Maestro M. A., Mahía J., Arnaiz F. J., Lezama L., Rojo T. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003;2003:2639–2650. [Google Scholar]
  56. García-Tojal J., Urtiaga M. K., Cortés R., Lezama L., Arriortua M. I., Rojo T. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1994:2233–2238. [Google Scholar]
  57. Buitrago E., Vuillamy A., Boumendjel A., Yi W., Gellon G., Hardré R., Philouze C., Serratrice G., Jamet H., Réglier M., Belle C. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53:12848–12858. doi: 10.1021/ic501829s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Katti K. V., Singh P. R., Barnes C. L. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993:2153–2156. [Google Scholar]
  59. Parrilha G. L., Ferraz K. S. O., Lessa J. A., Oliveira de K. N., Rodrigues B. L., Ramos J. P., Souza-Fagundes E. M., Ott I., Beraldo H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;84:537–544. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. da Silva J. G., Azzolini L. S., Wardell S. M. S. V., Wardell J. L., Beraldo H. Polyhedron. 2009;28:2301–2305. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kowol C. R., Eichinger R., Jakupec M. A., Galanski M., Arion V. B., Keppler B. K. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007;101:1946–1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Arion V. B., Jakupec M. A., Galanski M., Unfried P., Keppler B. K. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002;91:298–305. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(02)00419-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jayakumar K., Sithambaresan M., Aravindakshan A. A., Kurup M. R. P. Polyhedron. 2014;75:50–56. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ilies D. C., Shova S., Radulescu V., Pahontu E., Rosu T. Polyhedron. 2015;97:157–166. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sandhaus S., Taylor R., Edwards T., Huddleston A., Wooten Y., Venkatraman R., Weber R. T., González-Sarrías A., Martin P. M., Cagle P., Tse-Dinh Y. C., Beebe S. J., Seerame N., Holder A. A. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2016;64:45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2015.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yue X. R., Chen Y. N., Yang G. C., Yue S. M., Su Z. M. Synth. Met. 2015;200:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  67. Khandani M., Sedaghat T., Erfani N., Haghshenas M. R., Khavasi H. R. J. Mol. Struct. 2013;1037:136–143. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sheldrick G. M., SHELXTL V5.1, Software Reference Manual, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, 1997.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from MedChemComm are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES