Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 2;9:419. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00419

Table 3.

Association of LH/FSH ratio with visceral adiposity indicators: linear regression.

Dependent variables β B (Per-SD increase) 95% CI P R2
Log VAI (model 1) 0.113 0.094 0.061–0.127 < 0.001 0.014
Log VAI (model 2) 0.073 0.062 0.032–0.092 < 0.001 0.278
Log VAI (model 3) 0.070 0.060 0.030–0.090 < 0.001 0.280
Log CVAI (model 1) 0.141 0.062 0.046–0.078 < 0.001 0.169
Log CVAI (model 2) 0.112 0.050 0.034–0.066 < 0.001 0.283
Log CVAI (model 3) 0.101 0.045 0.029–0.061 < 0.001 0.293
Log LAP (model 1) 0.122 0.130 0.088–0.172 < 0.001 0.022
Log LAP (model 2) 0.101 0.110 0.070–0.149 < 0.001 0.248
Log LAP (model 3) 0.094 0.103 0.063–0.142 < 0.001 0.251

Model 1 adjusted for age and smoking.

Model 2 adjusted for age, smoking, HOMA-IR, hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Model 3 adjusted for age, smoking, HOMA-IR, hypertension, dyslipidemia, total testosterone (proportion above vs. below detection limit) and estradiol (proportion above vs. below detection limit).