Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;30(1):81–91. doi: 10.1002/acp.3170

Table 3.

Individual case analyses of sensitivity of SRs in experiment 1, using modified t‐tests for single‐case comparisons (Crawford et al., 2010)

Control mean (SD)
(N = 20)
SR1 SR2 SR3 SR4 SR5 SR6 SR7
d 1.39 (0.85) 3.92 2.37 3.24 3.92 3.11 2.58 3.28
t(19) 2.90 1.12 2.12 2.90 1.97 1.37 2.17
p (two‐tailed) .009 .274 .047 .009 .063 .188 .043
Zcc 2.98 1.15 2.18 2.98 2.02 1.40 2.22
95% CI for Zcc [1.93, 4.00] [0.57, 1.71] [1.35, 2.98] [1.93, 4.00] [1.24, 2.78] [0.77, 2.01] [1.39, 3.04]
Population below individual's score (%) 99.54 86.27 97.64 99.54 96.85 90.60 97.85
Criterion c −0.23 (0.32) 0.00 −0.25 0.33 0.00 −0.40 −0.35 0.60
t(19) 0.69 −0.07 1.71 0.69 −0.53 −0.38 2.50
p (two‐tailed) .499 .945 .104 .499 .604 .710 .021
Zcc 0.71 −0.01 1.75 0.71 −0.54 −0.39 2.56
95% CI for Zcc [0.21, 1.19] [−0.51, 0.36] [1.03, 2.44] [0.21, 1.19] [−1.00, 0.06] [−0.84, 0.07] [1.63, 3.47]
Population below individual's score (%) 75.03 47.26 94.79 75.03 30.21 35.49 98.91

Note: SD, standard deviation; SRs, super‐recognisers.