Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;30(1):81–91. doi: 10.1002/acp.3170

Table 5.

Individual case analyses of sensitivity and response bias of SRs in experiment 2, using modified t‐tests for single‐case comparisons (Crawford et al., 2010)

Control mean (SD)
(N = 20)
SR1 SR2 SR3 SR4 SR5 SR6 SR7
d 0.45 (0.45) 0.64 0.32 0.77 2.09 1.23 0.64 1.35
t(19) 0.40 −0.29 0.69 3.55 1.73 0.40 1.95
p (two‐tailed) .690 .774 .500 .002 .108 .690 .067
Zcc 0.41 −0.30 0.70 3.64 1.73 0.41 1.99
95% CI for Zcc [−0.05, 0.86] [−0.74, 0.15] [0.20, 1.19] [1.02, 2.42] [1.24, 2.78] [−0.05, 0.86] [1.22, 2.75]
Population below individual's score (%) 65.48 38.74 74.97 99.89 96.85 65.48 96.67
Criterion c 0.02 (0.18) 0.07 −0.25 0.00 −0.92 0.23 0.07 0.00
t(19) 0.29 −0.07 −0.09 −5.12 −0.53 0.29 −0.09
p (two‐tailed) .777 .945 .925 <.001 .604 .777 .925
Zcc 0.29 −0.01 −0.10 −5.24 −0.54 0.29 −0.09
95% CI for Zcc [−0.16, 0.74] [−0.51, 0.36] [−0.53, 0.34] [−6.94, −3.53] [−1.00, 0.06] [−0.16, 0.74] [−0.53, 0.34]
Population below individual's score (%) 61.16 47.26 0.003 75.03 30.21 61.16 46.29

Note: SD, standard deviation; SRs, super‐recognisers.