Table 1.
Co-expression | V1/2 (mV) | Slope (mV) | I30/Ca2+ (pA/pF) | R250/Ca2+ (%) | R250/Ba2+ (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CaV2.2 | Mock | 18.7 ± 2.7 n = 20 |
6.2 ± 0.8 n = 20 |
−71.1 ± 8.4 n = 37 |
17.4 ± 2.3 n = 31 |
79.0 ± 2.5 n = 13 |
CaM | 13.5 ± 2.7 n = 8 |
4.6 ± 1.0 n = 8 |
−29.9 ± 11.7* n = 10 |
23.8 ± 5.1 n = 11 |
60.7 ± 5.2* n = 10 |
|
CaM12 | 24.7 ± 2.4 n = 4 |
7.1 ± 0.6 n = 4 |
−170.3 ± 25.7** n = 6 |
45.1 ± 4.2* n = 11 |
68.7 ± 4.3* n = 8 |
|
CaM34 | 25.5 ± 3.2 n = 5 |
7.7 ± 1.3 n = 5 |
−78.0 ± 16.5 n = 8 |
45.0 ± 4.3* n = 13 |
82.5 ± 3.8 n = 6 |
|
CaM1234 | 21.9 ± 2.9 n = 16 |
5.9 ± 0.8 n = 16 |
−51.8 ± 11.3* n = 11 |
41.0 ± 4.1* n = 17 |
82.1 ± 4.8 n = 5 |
|
CaV2.2IF/AF | Mock | 31.6 ± 1.9 n = 7 |
8.8 ± 1.2 n = 7 |
−38.5 ± 9.4 n = 17 |
21.5 ± 4.0 n = 17 |
68.5 ± 3.9 n = 4 |
CaM | 26.2 ± 3.4 n = 5 |
8.6 ± 1.9 n = 5 |
−52.8 ± 15.0 n = 9 |
24.9 ± 3.5 n = 8 |
64.7 ± 6.0 n = 11 |
|
CaM12 | 15.4 ± 5.7 n = 5 |
6.8 ± 1.6 n = 5 |
−109.5 ± 40.9 n = 7 |
45.2 ± 2.8 n = 8 |
61.5 ± 5.5 n = 5 |
|
CaM34 | 37.7 ± 2.5 n = 5 |
14.2 ± 3.2 n = 5 |
−23.7 ± 7.9 n = 12 |
25.0 ± 4.1 n = 12 |
67.6 ± 5.5 n = 6 |
|
CaM1234 | 30.7 ± 2.8 n = 5 |
9.1 ± 0.6 n = 5 |
−33.3 ± 9.3 n = 16 |
33.5 ± 7.6 n = 7 |
69.5 ± 8.6 n = 5 |
|
CaV2.2IF/AA | Mock | 41.4 ± 2.0 n = 6 |
13.2 ± 1.1 n = 6 |
−13.4 ± 3.3 n = 9 |
19.5 ± 2.6 n = 6 |
57.7 ± 4.8 n = 6 |
CaM | 30.0 ± 4.9 n = 6 |
7.9 ± 2.1 n = 6 |
−60.5 ± 19.9 n = 9 |
25.2 ± 5.7 n = 7 |
63.4 ± 6.8 n = 4 |
|
CaM12 | 10.6 ± 13.1 n = 3 |
6.4 ± 2.1 n = 3 |
−118.8 ± 41.3 n = 4 |
37.8 ± 5.6 n = 6 |
82.6 ± 4.3 n = 4 |
|
CaM34 | 7.6 ± 10.1 n = 3 |
0.8 ± 0.5 n = 3 |
−63.1 ± 20.3 n = 7 |
22.5 ± 2.6 n = 5 |
63.4 ± 6.8 n = 3 |
|
CaM1234 | 25.0 ± 6.4 n = 4 |
8.1 ± 2.5 n = 4 |
−20.0 ± 4.4 n = 9 |
16.0 ± 8.1 n = 8 |
42.7 ± 3.1 n = 3 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s post hoc test. *: p < 0.05 and **: p < 0.01 when compared to the Mock group.