Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202176

Table 3. Comparison of the cardioprotective efficacy of TAK-272 and aliskiren with respect to cardiac hypertrophy and plasma heart failure biomarker level.

Parameter Group (n)
WT CSQ-tg
Vehicle Vehicle TAK-272 Aliskiren
300 mg/kg 300 mg/kg
(4) (8) (11) (12)
Body weight (g) 19.6 ± 0.6 15.8 ± 1.5## 19.1 ± 1.0** 16.6 ± 2.3
Left ventricle (mg) 67.4 ± 1.4 154.4 ± 15.8## 150.0 ± 9.2 150.2 ± 11.6
Right ventricle (mg) 14.5 ± 1.4 46.0 ± 6.8## 40.6 ± 5.3* 45.5 ± 3.0
Left atrium (mg) 2.1 ± 0.3 14.3 ± 3.8## 8.2 ± 3.0** 11.4 ± 2.2
Right atrium (mg) 2.9 ± 0.8 8.1 ± 1.8## 5.3 ± 0.8* 7.9 ± 2.2
Lung (mg) 120.5 ± 7.4 138.7 ± 15.0# 121.3 ± 10.1* 129.9 ± 13.6
NT-proBNP (ng/ml) 1.0 ± 0.1 8.5 ± 3.5## 4.5 ± 1.3* 7.7 ± 2.3

The body weights, cardiac tissue and lung weights, and plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels of wild-type (WT) (n = 4) and calsequestrin transgenic (CSQ-tg) mice orally treated with vehicle (n = 8), TAK-272 (300 mg/kg, n = 11), or aliskiren (300 mg/kg, n = 12) are indicated. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. The number of deaths in each group during the study period was as follows: 0, 4, 1, and 0 in WT, vehicle, TAK-272, and aliskiren groups, respectively.

#P < 0.05

##P < 0.01 vs. WT, by Student's t-test or Aspin-Welch's t-test

*P < 0.05

**P < 0.01 vs. CSQ-tg + vehicle by Dunnett's test or Steel's test.