Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Mar 19;27(7):2254–2264. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1065-9

Table 1.

Sample characteristics and descriptive information in 119 girls at risk for Type 2 diabetes

Mean SD Range
Age, years 14.5 1.6 12–17
BMI, kg/m2 33.0 6.6 22.9–52.2
BMI z-score 1.97 0.47 1.02–2.93
Body fat, % 42.9 5.8 30.9–58.1
Lean mass, kg 48.0 8.6 31.1–79.8
Fasting insulin, mIU/Ld 24.2 13.6 3.7–59.2
Fasting glucose, mg/dLd 89.1 6.8 73–109
HOMA-IRd 5.3 3.1 0.7–12.8
Dispositional mindfulnessb 58.5 12.6 28–85
Depressive/anxiety symptomsa 8.6 4.2 1–17
Pre-test basal afternoon cortisol, ng/dLc 78.9 27.7 60–140
Cold-pressor test maximum painc 65.1 33.3 0–100
Cold-pressor test maximum unpleasantnessc 72.1 33.2 0–100
Peak cortisol response, ng/dLc 83.4 34.6 60–163
Cortisol AUCgc 4899.8 1389.8 3900–7950
Cortisol AUCic −210.3 1114.3 −2145–1575
Cold-pressor test negative affect responsec 12.9 2.6 10–18.5

No. (%)

Race/ethnicity
  Non-Hispanic Black 74 (62.2)
  White 19 (16.0)
  Hispanic 13 (10.9)
  Asian 4 (3.4)
  Multiple races 9 (7.6)
Late Puberty (Tanner 5) 84 (70.6)
Obesity, BMI ≥95th percentile 87 (73.1)

BMI=body mass index; HOMA-IR=homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; AUCg=area under the curve with respect to ground; AUCi=area under the curve with respect to increase.

a

n=1 missing value;

b

n=7 missing values;

c

n=6 missing values;

d

n=3 missing values.