Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Mar 19;27(7):2254–2264. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1065-9

Table 2.

Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses evaluating the main and moderating effects of dispositional mindfulness and depressive/anxiety symptoms on pain, unpleasantness, and negative affect in response to a cold-pressor test

Maximum Paina Maximum Unpleasantnessb Negative Affect Responsec

Predictors B SE β B SE β B SE β
Step 1
Mindfulness −.64 .27 −.24* −.52 .27 −.20^ −.04 .02 −.21**
Depressive/anxiety .02 .81 .00 .14 .80 .02 −.01 .05 −.02
Model R2 .08^ .05 .42***
ΔR2 .06* .04 .04*
Step 2
Mindfulness × Depression/anxiety .03 .06 .05 .00 .06 .00 .00 .00 −.02
Model R2 .08 .05 .42
ΔR2 .00 .00 .00

B=Unstandardized estimate; SE=standard error; β=standardized estimate; Model R2=total variance explained in the dependent variable; ΔR2=variance explained in the dependent variable by the set of variables added at each step.

In addition to variables displayed (mindfulness, depression/anxiety, and mindfulness × depression/anxiety), estimates were adjusted for acold-pressor test start time and pre-cold-pressor test pain;

b

pre-cold-pressor test unpleasantness and cold-pressor test duration;

c

pre-cold-pressor test negative affect.

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05,

^

p<.10.