Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Mar 27;118(5):591–596.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.02.010

Table 2.

Characteristics of tree nut oral food challenges

No. Pass rate OFC with sIgE <2 kUA/L, no. (%) OFC with sIgE ≥2 kUA/L, no. (%) OFC with SPT <3 mm, no. (%) OFC with SPT ≥3 mm, no. (%)
All TN challenges 156 86% 124 (79) 16 (10) 101 (65) 41 (26)
TN allergic 67 76% 60 (90) 3 (4) 39 (58) 25 (37)
TN sensitized 65 91% 47 (72) 13 (20) 45 (69) 16 (25)
Avoiding due to other FA 24 100% 17 (71) - 17 (71) -
Almond 54 100% 42 (78) 6 (11) 37 (69) 11 (20)
Cashew 28 79% 28 (100) 0 (0) 18 (64) 9 (32)
Walnut 27 82% 19 (70) 3 (11) 15 (56) 10 (37)
Hazelnut 18 83% 12 (67) 4 (22) 13 (72) 2 (11)
Pecan 14 79% 10 (71) 1 (7) 11 (79) 3 (21)
Pistachio 13 69% 11 (85) 2 (15) 8 (62) 4 (31)
Brazil nut 2 50% 2 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (100)

TN=tree nut; FA=food allergy; sIgE=specific IgE; SPT=skin prick test.

92% of TN challenges had both sIgE and SPT performed, 9% had SPT performed only, and 9% had sIgE performed only.