Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 3;9:1203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01203

Table 3.

Results of regression analyses predicting sample size, switching frequency and choices maximizing EV in Experiment 1.

Predictor Sample size Switching frequency EV choices Experienced mean returns

b 95% CI p b 95% CI p b 95% CI p b 95% CI p
Intercept 12.90∗∗ (10.52, 15.27) <0.001 0.49∗∗ (0.42, 0.56) <0.001 3.99∗∗ (3.76, 4.22) <0.001 5.49 (5.1, 5.83) <0.001
Numeracy 4.13∗∗ (1.74, 6.51) <0.001 −0.06 (−0.13, 0.01) 0.071 0.01 (−0.23, 0.24) 0.954 0.66∗∗∗ (0.31, 1.01) <0.001
Group (Fear) −4.12 (−8.86, 0.64) 0.089 −0.04 (−0.18, 0.10) 0.632 0.28 (−0.18, 0.74) 0.238 −0.92 (−1.6,−0.22) 0.010
NumeracyGroup −1.56 (−6.32, 3.22) 0.520 0.1 (−0.04, 0.24) 0.134 −0.32 (−0.78, 0.16) 0.186 0.46 (−0.24, 1.16) 0.190
R2 = 0.119∗∗ R2 = 0.052 R2 = 0.028 R2 = 0.165∗∗∗

Group was coded as 0.5 (Fear) and -0.5 (Baseline). p < 0.1, p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.