Table 6.
Results of regression analyses predicting sample size, switching frequency, choices maximizing EV and experienced mean returns in Experiment 2.
| Sample size | Switching frequency | EV choices | Experienced mean returns | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p |
| Intercept | 22.01∗∗ | (15.51, 28.52) | <0.001 | 0.40∗∗ | (0.32, 0.48) | <0.001 | 4.46∗∗ | (4.11, 4.81) | <0.001 | 5.47 | (4.98, 5.97) | <0.001 |
| Numeracy | 9.67∗∗ | (3.20, 16.13) | 0.003 | −0.11∗ | (−0.19,−0.03) | 0.011 | 0.17 | (−0.17, 0.52) | 0.325 | 0.2 | (−0.3, 0.69) | 0.430 |
| Group (Fear) | 9.16 | (−3.84, 22.18) | 0.165 | −0.08 | (−0.24, 0.08) | 0.363 | −0.28 | (−0.98, 0.40) | 0.417 | −0.38 | (−1.38, 0.62) | 0.453 |
| Numeracy∗Group | 13.28∗ | (0.36, 26.22) | 0.044 | 0.00 | (−0.16, 0.18) | 0.915 | 0.12 | (−0.58, 0.80) | 0.742 | 0.44 | (−0.54, 1.44) | 0.373 |
| R2 = 0.169∗∗ | R2 = 0.091 | R2 = 0.019 | R2 = 0.022 | |||||||||
Group was coded as 0.5 (Fear) and -0.5 (Baseline). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.