Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 2;9:1339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for the different stimulus-response compatibility task conditions1.

Task Condition M 95% CI
SD Range Reliability2
LL UL
Stroop Control 806 781 831 145 514–1300 0.89
Congruent 808 780 836 163 541–1276 0.96
Ineligible 957 917 998 236 546–2061 0.94
Eligible 986 941 1032 264 570–1999 0.92
Flanker Control 865 825 904 233 488–1601 0.85
Congruent 776 747 804 168 496–1203 0.95
Compatible 792 760 823 187 480–1342 0.96
Incompatible 89 855 927 214 523–1575 0.94
Simon Control 607 583 631 143 398–1237 0.81
Congruent 608 587 630 127 392–1043 0.90
Incongruent 617 599 635 108 414–1120 0.90
Shape matching Control 855 816 895 230 483–2121 0.91
Distractor 1088 1027 1150 360 613–353 0.94

N = 136. M, mean; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; SD, standard deviation. 1All figures are in milliseconds (ms); 2internal consistency reliability calculated using Cronbach’s alpha.