Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 9;13:197. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0906-y

Table 2.

Patient, fracture and procedural characteristics in 190 patients with a proximal humeral fracture

No calcar screws (n = 93) Calcar screws (n = 97) Mean difference or relative risk (95% CI) p value
Age (years), mean (SD) 65 (15) 69 (13) 4.7 (0.7–8.7) 0.02 b
 median (IQR) 68 (17) 70 (20) 0.06 c
Women 64 (69) 68 (70) 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 0.8 d
Smokers 21 (23) 27 (28) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.4 d
Diabetes 13 (14) 8 (8) 1.7 (0.7–3.9) 0.2 d
Non-compliance 9 (10) 7 (7) 1.3 (0.5–3.5) 0.5 d
ASA III or IV 31 (33) 23 (24) 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 0.1 d
3 or 4 part fracture type 68 (73) 74 (76) 1.0 (0.8–1.1) 0.6 d
Fracture dislocation 7 (8) 6 (6) 1.2 (0.4–3.5) 0.7 d
Preoperative varus < 105° 22 (24) 21 (22) 1.1 (0.6–1.8) 0.7 d
Preoperative valgus > 180° 16 (17) 19 (20) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 0.7 d
Medial comminution 54 (58) 75 (77) 0.8 (0.6–0.9) 0.006 d
Surgical approach: deltoid split 69 (74) 40 (41) 1.8 (1.4–2.3) < 0.001 d
Residual varus malalignment < 120° a 6 (7) 5 (5) 1.3 (0.4–4.0) 0.7 d

Percentages in parenthesis unless stated otherwise

CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range, ASA American Society of Anaesthesiologists

an = 88 and 93, bIndependent two-sample t test,c Mann–Whitney test, dz statistics