Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Dent J. 2016 Dec 19;27(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.pdj.2016.08.001

Table 1.

Children with and without enamel hypoplasia by explanatory variables: Median or mean (standard deviation), or % of total.

With enamel hypoplasia n=13 Without enamel hypoplasia n=16 Comparison (p-value)

Maternal and child race/ethnicity 0.3
 White 7/13 = 54% 6/16 = 38%
 Hispanic 2/13 = 15% 7/16 = 44%
 Black 4/13 = 31% 3/16 = 19%

Maternal age, years 28.5 (5.5) 28.7 (6.5) 0.95*

Maternal 25(OH)D (ng/ml) 12 – 40 weeks of gestation
32.1 (13.6) 33.6 (12.8) 0.76*

Maternal pregnancy complication 13 none 12 none, 2 minor, 1 moderate, 1 severe Insufficient

Mode of delivery 11 vaginal, 2 C-section 13 vaginal, 3 C-section Insufficient

Level of neonatal care 13 normal newborn 16 normal newborn Insufficient

RCT treatment group 1 6 5 Insufficient
 2 3 5
 3 4 6

Child sex 7/13 = 54% F 8/16 = 50% F 0.8

Child age (years) 3.4±0.8 3.75±0.9 0.31**

Child tooth count (average) 19.0 (3.2) 19.6 (1.1) 0.87*

Fisher’s exact test,

*

Student’s t-test,

**

Wilcoxon rank sum test presented where normality assumption was not met, median presented.