Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0201672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201672

Table 2. Nutrition in early life and epigenetics.

*(Organised by, exposure, DNA methylation (epigenome wide, global methylation, imprinted genes, other genes).

First author (year), country Cohort, N (% female) Early life variable(mean age ± SD (age range) DNA methylation Tissue Mean age at epigenetic measure ± SD (age range) Main result Confounders
Maternal dietary intake / nutritional biomarker
Joubert (2016), Norway & The Netherlands [85] MoBA: 1275 (NR)
Generation R: 713 (NR)
Plasma folate Infinium Human Methylation450 BeadChip Cord blood Birth 443 FDR-significant CpGs were differentially methylated in cord blood in relation to maternal folate. 48 CpGs met Bonferroni threshold (p<1.19x10-7). Selected loci from meta-analysis, Coef(SE), p:
cg15908975(GRM8):-0.012(0.002),6.76x10-7
cg18574254(GRM8):-0.011(0.002),3.27x10-9
cg22591480(SLC16A12):-0.008(0.002),1.34x10-5
cg14920044(SLC16A12):-0.011(0.003), 4.31x10-6
cg24829292(OPCML):0.010(0.002),6.60x10-6
cg 22629528(OPCML):0.019(0.005),2.91x10-5
cg 26283170(OPCML):0.009(0.002), 1.30x10-5
cg 24804179(PRPH):-0.007(0.002), 8.05x10-6
cg 05775627(PRPH):-0.007(0.002),1.01x10-5
cg 16010628(PRPH):-0.005(0.001), 1.73x10-5
cg 05635274(PRSS21):0.009(0.002),4.77x10-6
cg 02296564(PRSS21):0.011(0.003),6.21x10-6
cg 22730830(PRSS21):0.013(0.003),3.99x10-6
cg 01232511(PRSS21):0.014(0.003), 1.23x10-5
cg 10612259(LHX1):-0.011(0.002), 9.10x10-8
cg 011965477(LHX1):-0.002(0.001), 2.09x10-5
cg 11775595(APC2):-0.015(0.003), 1.64x10-7
cg 14907738(APC2):-0.006(0.001), 8.57x10-6
cg 27150718(APC2):-0.009(0.002),5.81x10-7
cg 03165176(APC2):-0.012(0.003),1.44x10-5
cg 14559388(APC2):-0.003(0.001),4.98x10-6
cg 04624885(APC2):-0.010(0.002), 1.56x10-5
cg 19870717(APC2):-0.009(0.002),4.64x10-9
cg 16613938(APC2):-0.016(0.003),3.05x10-8
cg 23291200(APC2):-0.010(0.002),1.72x10-9
cg 13793157(KLK4):-0.009(0.002), 4.00x10-5
cg10078829(KLK4):-0.007(0.002), 1.84x10-5
Maternal age, education, smoking during pregnancy, parity, batch effects
Boeke (2012), US [86] Project Viva,
Periconceptional intake: 516
Second trimester intake: 484 (47.7)
FFQ for B-vitamins (32 ± 5.1y) LINE-1 using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth 0–4 weeks gestation, β = %5MC difference in LINE-1 methylation for increment in 1 SD in nutrient
Methyl donor(Cumulative Index): β = -0.02 (-0.04, 0.01), p = 0.17
maternal vitamin B12 (μg/d): β = 0.01 (-0.06,0.08), p = 0.70
maternal betaine (mg/d): β = -0.04 (-0.11,0.03), p = 0.24
maternal choline (mg/d): β = -0.02 (-0.08,0.04), p = 0.45
maternal folate (μg/d)e: β = -0.03 (-0.10,0.03), p = 0.32
Second trimester, β = %5MC difference in LINE-1 methylation for increment in 1 SD for nutrients
maternal vitamin B12: β = -0.02 (-0.09,0.06), p = 0.64
maternal betaine: β = -0.02 (-0.10,0.05), p = 0.50
maternal choline:β = -0.004 (-0.07,0.06), p = 0.98
maternal folate: β = -0.02 (-0.08,0.05), p = 0.61
Other methyl donors, child's sex, mother's age, race, smoking, pregnancy, weight gain, education, cadmium intake
Pauwels (2017), Belgium [87] MANOE, 115(47.8) FFQ for methyl donor intake & folic acid supplementation (31±3.6y) Global DNA methylation using mass-spectrometry method & DNMT1, LEP, RXRA, IGF2 DMR using PCR Cord blood Birth (GAD 39.6±0.9w) Before pregnancy (n = 24) β(95%CI), p:
LEP:
Betaine: -0.13(-3.45, 3.19), p = 0.94
Choline: 1.48(-1.48, 4,45), p = 0.31
Folate: -0.33(-2.75, 2.09), p = 0.78
Methionine: 0.427 (0.01, 0.85), p = 0.048
DNMT1:
Betaine:0.675(0.04, 1,31), p = 0.039
Choline:0.13(-0.52,0.78), p = 0.68
Folate:0.21(-0.3, 0.72), p = 0.40
Methionine: 0.04(-0.06, 0.14), p = 0.37
Second trimester (n = 89) β(95%CI), p:
LEP:
Betaine:-0.575(-1.16, 0.01), p = 0.05
Choline:-0.47(-0.95, 0.02), p = 0.058
Folate:-0.507(-0.89, -0.13), p = 0.009
Methionine: -0.06(-0.14, 0.02), p = 0.15
DNMT1:
Betaine:-0.25(-0.58, 0.09), p = 0.15
Choline: -0.301(-0.57, -0.03), p = 0.03
Folate:-0.226(-0.45, -0.01), p = 0.045
Methionine: -0.04(-0.08, 0.009), p = 0.12
Third trimester (n = 89) β(95%CI), p:
RXRA:
Betaine: 0.35(-1.24, 1.94), p = 0.66
Choline:-0.935(-2.08, 0.21), p = 0.11
Folate:-1.001(-1.96, -0.04), p = 0.041
Methionine: -0.15(-0.35, 0.06), p = 0.16
DNMT1:
Betaine:0.97(0.36, 3,67), p = 0.96
Choline:0.291(0.1. 0.84), p = 0.022
Folate:0.48(0.22, 1.06), p = 0.07
Methionine: 0.87 (0.74, 1.04), p = 0.12
Folic acid supplementation
LEP CpG1 methylation
> 6 months before conception vs. 3–6 months before conception: 34.6 ± 6.3% vs. 30.1 ± 3.6%, p = 0.011
LEP CpG3 methylation
> 6 months before conception vs no supplement before conception: 16.2 ± 4.4% vs. 13.9 ± 3%, p = 0.036
RXRA mean methylation
supplements during entire pregnancy vs. stopping in second trimester: 12.3 ± 1.9% vs. 11.1 ± 2%, p = 0.008
Maternal age, maternal BMI, maternal smoking before and during each trimester of pregnancy, gestational weight gain
Fryer (2009), UK [88] 24 (58.3) Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy (29.4±7y) LINE-1 methylation using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Correlation with LINE-1 methylation:
Maternal folic acid intake: β = 0.31, p = 0.15
Prescribed folic acid dose during pregnancy: β = 0.36, p = 0.31
Sex, GA maternal age, parity, and BMI and cord serum folate, plasma homocysteine
Haggarty (2013), UK [81] 913 (46) FFQ for folate intake, folic acid supplementation, RBC folate (30.5 (95%CI: 30.2–30.9y) IGF2 (4 CpGs), PEG3 (7 CpGs), SNRPN (15q11, 4 CpGs) LINE-1 (4 CpGs) using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth (GAD 3.95 (95%CI: 39.4, 39.6w)) LINE-1 methylation:
maternal folate intake (100ug/d):β = 0.002 (-0.20,0.20), p = 0.98
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (periconceptional):β = 0.05 (-0.25,0.35), p = 0.74
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (first 12 weeks gestation): β = 0.16 (-0.23,0.55), p = 0.42
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (after 12 weeks): β = -0.34 (-0.64,-0.04), p = 0.03
maternal RBC folate, 100 nmol/L:β = -0.13 (-0.20,-0.05), p = 0.001
PEG-3 methylation:
maternal folate intake (100ug/d):β = 0.002 (-0.20,0.2), p = 0.44
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (periconceptional):β = -0.02 (-0.40,0.37), p = 0.94
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (first 12 weeks gestation): β = -0.47 (-0.86,-0.08), p = 0.02
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (after 12 weeks):
maternal RBC folate, 100 nmol/L: β = -0.02 (-0.10,0.06), p = 0.60
SNRPN methylation:
maternal folate intake (100ug/d): β = 0.07 (-0.33,0.46), p = 0.74
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (periconceptional): β = -0.22 (-0.36,0.81), p = 0.46
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (first 12 weeks gestation): β = 0.39 (-0.37,1.15), p = 0.32
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (after 12 weeks): β = -0.01 (-0.60,0.58), p = 0.97
maternal RBC folate, 100 nmol/L:β = 0.02 (-0.12,0.15), p = 0.82
IGF2 methylation:
maternal folate intake (100ug/d): β = 0.23 (-0.21,0.67), p = 0.32
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (periconceptional): β = 0.31 (-0.35,0.96), p = 0.36
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (first 12 weeks gestation): β = -0.10 (-0.95,0.76), p = 0.83
maternal folate supplement use, yes/no (after 12 weeks): β = 0.68 (0.02,1.35), p = 0.04
maternal RBC folate, 100 nmol/L:β = 0.10 (-0.05,0.24), p = 0.18
McKay (2012), UK [89] The North Cumbria Community Genetics Project,
Infant: 294 (48)
Maternal: 121
Serum B12 (median 28.6y) Global DNA methylation using LUMA & IGF2, IGFBP3, ZNT5 using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Global DNA methylation correlated inversely with maternal vitamin B12 concentrations: β = 0.0002(0.0001), p = 0.06.
After adjustment:
serum B12:β = 0.00007 (0.00007), p = 0.29
Sex, GA, infant MTHFR genotype
Hoyo (2011), US [90] NEST 428 (50) Folic acid supplement before (n = 428) and during pregnancy (n = 223) (29 ± 6.2y) IGF2 & H19 DMR using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Methylation % difference for folic acid supplement before pregnancy:
IGF2 methylation:
Moderate vs. non-users: 0.28, p = 0.76
High (i.e. prescribed & over the counter) vs. non-users: -1.15, p = 0.39
H19 methylation:
Moderate vs. non-users:-1.96, p = 0.03
High vs. non-users: -2.76, p = 0.04
Methylation % difference for folic acid supplement during pregnancy:
IGF2 methylation:
Moderate vs. non-users:0.75, p = 0.59
High vs. non-users: 0.25, p = 0.93
H19 methylation:
Moderate vs. non-users:-2.87, p = 0.02
High vs. non-users: -4.90, p = 0.05
Maternal education, race, mode of delivery, cigarette smoking, sex
Steegers-Theunissen (2009), The Netherlands [62] HAVEN study controls 120(~58) Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy 400 μg/day vs. no supplement IGF2 (5 CPGs) using mass-spectrometry based method Blood 17 months Mean (SE) of IGF2 methylation in childhood without maternal exposure to folic acid n = 34 vs. exposed n = 86:
0.474(0.007) vs. 0.495(0.004), p = 0.014
Adjusted analysis: mean difference in IGF2 methylation 4.5% (1.8) with maternal exposure to folic acid vs unexposed, p = 0.014
Maternal education
Loke (2013), Australia [91] PETS 95 twin pairs (55 MZ & 40 DZ) (~50%) Folate and macronutrient intake IGF2 and H19 DMRs using mass-spectrometry based method HUVECs, (CBMCs and granulocytes); ectoderm (buccal epithelium) and extra embryonic ectoderm (placenta) Birth (GAD median 37.0±1.94w) Difference (p) in absolute percentage methylation in all tissues combined
All Assays combined
Had folate: 0.50(0.44)
Vitamin B12 (z-score): -0.23(0.24)
Homocysteine(z-score): 0.27(0.29)
Macronutrients (z-score): 0.37(0.17)
H19 promoter DMR
Had folate: -1.70(0.024)
Vitamin B12 (z-score): -0.97(0.002)
Homocysteine(z-score): 0.10(0.75)
Macronutrients (z-score): 0.80(0.049)
IGF2/H19 ICR
Had folate: 0.40(0.69)
Vitamin B12 (z-score): -0.23(0.54
Homocysteine(z-score): 0.40(0.29)
Macronutrients (z-score): 0.20(0.050)
IGF2 DMR0
Had folate: 0.90(0.46)
Vitamin B12 (z-score):0.23(0.55)
Homocysteine(z-score): 0.37(0.30)
Macronutrients (z-score): 0.43(0.27)
IGF2 DMR2
Had folate: 2.90(0.035)
Vitamin B12 (z-score):0.27(0.63)
Homocysteine(z-score): 0.17(0.72)
Macronutrients (z-score): 0.10(0.77)
Differences in coefficients between cell types
Had folate: HUVECs vs buccal -4.5%; p = 0.026;
Vitamin B12 z-score: Granulocytes vs buccal (2.1%; p = 0.004).
No other difference found
Azzi (2014), France [43] EDEN 254(NR) FFQ for B-vitamins & supplementation (during pregnancy (29.8±4.4y)) ZAC1 DMR using methylation-specific PCR Cord blood Birth (GA at birth 39.5±1.5) Spearman’s rank partial correlation coefficients
Prior to pregnancy:
Vitamin B2: 0.14 p = 0.04
Vitamin B3: 0.04, p = 0.60
Vitamin B6: 0.04, p = 0.49
Vitamin B9: 0.02, p = 0.74
Vitamin B12: 0.11, p = 0.08
Last 3 months of pregnancy:
Vitamin B2: 0.11 p = 0.09
Vitamin B3: 0.08, p = 0.22
Vitamin B6: 0.04, p = 0.5
Vitamin B9: 0.04, p = 0.56
Vitamin B12: 0.02, p = 0.79
No association with folic acid supplementation and/or the use of a combination of micronutrients either prior to or during pregnancy (estimates not provided)
Obermann-Bors (2013), The Netherlands [64] 120 (50) Folic acid supplementation LEP using mass-spectrometry based method Blood 17± 2.5m Variable, % absolute methylation change (SE), p
No folic acid: 0.1(0.8) p = 0.91
Batch, correlation between 7 CpGs,
Adkins (2010), NR**[92] 30 (NR) Biomarkers on one carbon pathway ~15,000 loci (Details not specified) NR Birth Phosphatidyl choline was significantly correlated with newborn DNA methylation at a subset of loci
Ba (2011), China [93] 99 (48) B-vitamin biomarker (27.8 ±5.3y) IGF2 promoters using methylation-specific PCR Cord blood Birth (96% GAD 37-41w) Promoter P2: Mean change per SD of each characteristic (p):
Maternal blood serum folate: 0.05 (0.47)
Maternal blood serum vitamin B12: 0.09 (0.19)
Promoter P3: Mean change per SD of each characteristic (p):
Maternal blood serum folate: 0.049 (0.47)
Maternal blood serum vitamin B12: -0.22 (0.001)
Mother’s age, maternal prepregnancy BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, mother’s highest education level, parity, supplementation intake during pregnancy,
birth weight and birth length, sex, and GA
Hoyo (2014), US [35] NEST 496 (49.7) Erythrocyte folate (first trimester) IGF2, H19, DLK1, MEG3, PEG3, MEST, PEG10, SGCE, NNAT using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Erythrocyte folate quartiles β(SE):
MEG3 methylation:β = -2.02 (0.58), p = 0.001 for Q4 vs Q1
NNAT methylation:β = -1.34 (0.73, p = 0.07 for Q3 vs Q1
PEG10/SEGCE methylation:β = -0.14 (0.33), p = 0.66 for Q4 vs Q1
MEG3-IG methylation:β = -0.68 (0.61), p = 0.27 for Q4 vs Q1
PLAG1 methylation:β = -1.01 (0.40), p = 0.01 for Q3 vs Q1
PEG3 methylation:β = 0.43 (0.22), p = 0.03 for Q2 vs Q1
PEG3/MEST methylation:β = 0.39 (0.44), p = 0.37 for Q4 vs Q1
H19 methylation:β = 0.09 (0.33), p = 0.78 for Q4 vs Q1
IGR2 methylation:β = -0.04 (0.43), p = 0.004 for Q2 vs Q1
Maternal race, sex, cigarette smoking, GAD, GA at blood draw, physical activity, pre-pregnancy BMI, and delivery route
McCullough (2016), US [94] NEST 429 (50) B-vitamin biomarkers (56% between 20-29y) H19 MEG3 SGCE/PEG10 PLAGL1 DMR using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth H19 methylation β(SE)
serum B12:β = -0.41 (0.57), p = 0.48 for Q4 vs Q1
serum pyridoxal phosphate: β = -0.07 (0.63), p = 0.91 for Q4 vs Q1
serum 4-pyridoxic acid:β = -0.57 (0.61), p = 0.35 for Q4 vs Q1
serum homocysteine: β = 1.01 (0.59), p = 0.09 for Q2 vs Q1
MEG3 methylation β(SE)
serum B12:β = -0.93 (0.85), p = 0.27 for Q4 vs Q1
serum pyridoxal phosphate: β = 3.24 (0.89), p<0.01 for Q4 vs Q1
serum 4-pyridoxic acid:β = 1.62 (0.87), p = 0.06 for Q4 vs Q1
serum homocysteine: β = 1.60 (0.87), p = 0.07 for Q4 vs Q1
SGCE/PEG10 methylation β(SE)
serum B12:β = 0.47 (0.67), p = 0.48 for Q4 vs Q1
serum pyridoxal phosphate: β = -0.30 (0.81), p = 0.71 for Q4 vs Q1
serum 4-pyridoxic acid:β = 1.46 (0.74), p = 0.05 for Q2 vs Q1
serum homocysteine: β = 1.43 (0.77), p = 0.06 for Q2 vs Q1
PLAG1 methylation β(SE):
serum B12:β = 1.79 (0.96), p = 0.06 for Q4 vs Q1
serum pyridoxal phosphate:β = -0.11 (1.04), p = 0.91 for Q4 vs Q1
serum 4-pyridoxic acid:β = -0.15 (0.99), p = 0.88 for Q4 vs Q1
serum homocysteine: β = 1.77 (0.97), p = 0.07 for Q3 vs Q1
GAD, GA at blood draw, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal smoking and pre-pregnancy body mass index
Dominguez-Salas (2014), The Gambia [95] Keneba Cohort 126 (43) One-carbon metabolism biomarkers (18-45y) Metastable epialleles: BOLA3, LOC654433, EXD3, ZFVE28 using methylation-specific amplification microarray and pyrosequencing. RBM46, PARD6G, ZNF678 using pyrosequencing Blood lymphocytes (n = 126),
Hair follicle (n = 87)
3.6 ±0.9m Effect sizes are 1)standardised β coefficient for change in mean DNA methylation (combined MEs) per 1 SD of the predictor and 2) odds ratio per change in predictor:
Peripheral blood lymphocyte:
serum folate nmol/
l: β = 0.02(-0.07,0.12), OR = 1.03 (0.90,1.17), p = 0.62
serum vitamin B2 1/EGRAC:β = 0.09 (0.00,0.19), OR = 1.19 (0.98,1.46), p = 0.05
serum vitamin B12 pmol/l: β = 0.03 (-0.07,0.14), OR = 1.04 (0.91,1.19), p = 0.54
serum active vitamin B12 pmol/l: β = -0.04 (-0.16,0.07), OR = 0.98 (0.87–1.11), p = 0.45
serum choline umol/l: β = -0.01 (-0.12,0.09), OR = 0.95 (0.80–1.12), p = 0.80
serum betaine umol/l: β = 0.05 (-0.10,0.20), OR = 1.03 (0.89–1.19), p = 0.49
serum dimethyl glycine umol/l:β = -0.06 (-0.16,0.04), OR = 0.95 (0.86,1.04), p = 0.21
serum betaine/dimethyl glycine:β = 0.08 (-0.02,0.17), OR = 1.05 (0.97,1.14), p = 0.11
serum S-adenosylmethionine nmol/l: β = -0.06 (-0.17,0.05), OR = 0.79 (0.58,1.08), p = 0.28
serum S-adenosylhomocysteine nmol/l: β = -0.09 (-0.18,0.01), OR = 0.88 (0.75,1.02), p = 0.07
maternal serum S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine: β = 0.06 (-0.03,0.15), OR = 1.08 (0.92,1.27), p = 0.18
serum methionine umol/l: β = 0.07 (-0.03,0.18), OR = 1.19 (0.90,1.56), p = 0.18
serum homocysteine umol/l: β = -0.14 (-0.23,-0.05), OR = 0.80 (0.68,0.93), p = 0.003
maternal serum vitamin B6 nmol/l: β = -0.16 (-0.27,-0.04), OR = 0.82 (0.71,0.94), p = 0.005
serum cysteine umol/l: β = -0.19 (-0.31,-0.07), OR = 0.45 (0.30,0.68), p = 0.002
Hair follicle:
serum folate nmol/l: β = 0.01 (-0.11,0.13), OR = 1.00 (0.86,1.16), p = 0.81
serum vitamin B2 1/EGRAC:β = 0.11 (0.00,0.22), OR = 1.22 (0.97,1.53), p = 0.04
serum vitamin B12 pmol/l: β = 0.08 (-0.06,0.23), OR = 1.06 (0.88,1.26), p = 0.25
serum active vitamin B12 pmol/l:β = -0.03 (-0.18,0.13), OR = 1.00 (0.85,1.18), p = 0.75
serum choline umol/l: β = 0.01 (-0.13,0.14), OR = 0.96 (0.77,1.19), p = 0.91
serum betaine umol/l: β = 0.13 (-0.07,0.32), OR = 1.06 (0.88,1.28), p = 0.19
serum dimethyl glycine umol/l:β = -0.02 (-0.15,0.11), OR = 0.97 (0.86,1.09), p = 0.79
serum betaine/dimethyl glycine:β = 0.06 (-0.06,0.18), OR = 1.04 (0.94,1.15), p = 0.34
serum S-adenosylmethionine nmol/l: β = -0.05 (-0.19,0.09), OR = 0.85 (0.57,1.27), p = 0.48
serum S-adenosylhomocysteine nmol/l:β = -0.12 (-0.25,0.01), OR = 0.84 (0.69,1.03), p = 0.06
serum S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine: β = 0.09 (-0.03,0.22), OR = 1.15 (0.93,1.41), p = 0.13
serum methionine umol/l: β = 0.00 (-0.13,0.14), OR = 0.99 (0.70,1.38), p = 0.96
serum homocysteine umol/l: β = -0.15 (-0.27,-0.03), OR = 0.82 (0.67,1.00), p = 0.02
maternal serum vitamin B6 nmol/l: β = -0.12 (-0.26,0.02), OR = 0.86 (0.73,1.02), p = 0.08
serum cysteine umol/l: β = -0.20 (-0.36,-0.04), OR = 0.43 (0.25,0.72), p = 0.01
Rerkasem (2015), Thailand [59] 249(NR) 24-hour food recall & FFQ in each trimester LINE-1 and Alu using COBRA Blood 20y % Total methylation, r, p(FDR)
Maternal Protein intake 1st trim:
Alu: 0.18, p = 0.46
LINE-1: -0.11, p = 0.75
Maternal Protein intake 2ndt trim:
Alu: -0.08, p = 0.61
LINE-1: 0.08, p = 0.61
Maternal Protein intake 3rd trim:
Alu: 0.04, p = 0.78
LINE-1: 0.06, p = 0.78
Maternal CHO intake 1st trim:
Alu: 0.05, p = 0.81
LINE-1: -0.05, p = 0.82
Maternal CHO intake 2nd trim:
Alu: 0.01, p = 0.87
LINE-1: -0.05, p = 0.88
Maternal CHO intake 3rd trim:
Alu: 0.07, p = 0.74
LINE-1:0.06, p = 0.73
Maternal fat intake 1st trim:
Alu: -0.11, p = 0.64
LINE-1: -0.22, p = 0.46
Maternal fat intake 2nd trim:
Alu: -0.09, p = 0.87
LINE-1: -0.007, p = 0.98
Maternal fat intake 3rd trim:
Alu: -0.17, p = 0.09
LINE-1:0.006, p = 0.96
Maternal energy intake 1st trim:
Alu: 0.03, p = 0.82
LINE-1: -0.11, p = 0.54
Maternal energy intake 2nd trim:
Alu: -0.02, p = 0.92
LINE-1: -0.03, p = 0.91
Maternal energy intake 3rd trim:
Alu: -0.008, p = 0.92
LINE-1:0.05, p = 0.88
Drake (2012), UK [61] The Motherwell Cohort, 34(64) FFQ (early ≤20w & late pregnancy >20w) HSD2 (promotor region), exon 1(C) and 1(F) of GR (exon 1(C) and 1(F)), IGF2 DMRs using pyrosequencing Blood 40 (0.12y) Correlation of mean GR exon 1F methylation during late pregnancy
Meat/w: r = 0.48, p = 0.009
Fish/w: r = 0.38, p = 0.048
Veg/w: r = 0.67, p<0.001
Bread/w: r = -0.49, p = 0.009
Potato/w: r = -0.39, p = 0.04
Methylation was increased at a specific CpG sites in HSD2 with increased meat (r = 0·42, p = 0·03) and fish r = 0·40, p = 0·04) intake in late pregnancy.
Other results not presented
Sex, BMI, birth weight.
Godfrey (2011), UK [96] PAH 78 (NR) FFQ (GA 15w) eNOS, SOD1, IL8, P13KCD, RXRA using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Higher methylation of RXRA but not of eNOS was associated with lower maternal CHO intake. Maternal fat and protein intake were not associated with RXRA methylation. No estimates for other nutrients/genes
Simpkin (2015), UK [58] AIRES 1018 (51) Serum selenium & vitamin D Infinium Human Methylation450 BeadChip to estimate Horvath epigenetic age Cord blood & blood Birth, 7.5y, 17.1y Correlations between early life variable and age acceleration:
Maternal selenium & AA at birth:-0.103, p = 0.06
Maternal selenium & AA 7 years: -0.137, p = 0.009
Maternal selenium & AA at 17 years: 0.01, p = 0.84
Maternal vitamin D & AA at birth:-0.05, p = 0.20
Maternal vitamin D & AA at 17 years: -0.002, p = 0.95
Maternal vitamin D & AA at 17 years: -0.009, p = 0.82
Cell-type composition
Early life dietary intake / nutritional biomarker
Simpkin (2015), UK [58] AIRES 1,018 (51) Breastfeeding Infinium Human Methylation450 BeadChip to estimate Horvath epigenetic age Cord blood & blood Birth, 7.5y, 17.1y Correlations between early life variable and age acceleration:
Breastfeeding & AA at birth: r = 0.035, p = 0.30
Breastfeeding & AA at 7 years: r = -0.010, p = 0.76
Breastfeeding & AA at 17 years: r = 0.026, p = 0.43
Cell-type composition
Rossnerova (2013), Czech Republic [97] Asthmatics:100 (45).
Controls:100(45)
Breastfeeding Infinium Human Methylation27 BeadChip Blood 11.6±2y Breastfeeding was associated with overall DNA methylation, but no statistical test performed
Obermann-Borst (2013), The Netherlands [64] 120 (50) Breastfeeding LEP using mass-spectrometry based method Blood 17± 2.5m % absolute methylation change (SE), p
Duration breast feeding: -0.6 (0.2), p = 0.04
Batch, correlation between 7 CpGs, birth weight, growth rate, smoking, BMI, GA, sex folic acid
Tao (2013), US [65] 639 (100) breast cancer cases Breastfeeding E-cadherin, p16 and RAR-β2, using PCR Breast tumour tissue 57.5y ±11.3 OR (95%CI) for methylation breastfed yes (ref) vs no
E-cadherin
Premenopausal group:
1.21(0.50,2.93)
Postmenopausal group:1.06(0.64,1.77)
P16
Premenopausal group:
2.75(1.14,1.67)
Postmenopausal group:0.79(0.49,1.26)
RAR-β2,
Premenopausal group: 1.18(0.53,2.62)
Postmenopausal group:
1.30(0.83–2.04)
Age, education, race, oestrogen receptor status
Wijnands (2015), UK [98] 120 (41.7) Breastfeeding & lipid biomarkers LEP & TNFα using mass-spectrometry based method Blood 17±2.5m %Absolute methylation change (i.e. methylation change per SD change in biomarker (SE)) TNFα
Total cholesterol: -1.0(0.5), p = 0.036. (Additional adjustment for HDL attenuated the results p = 0.07)
Triglycerides: 0.1(0.5), p = 0.773
HDL-cholesterol:-1.2(0.5), p = 0.013. (Adjustment for maternal HDL slightly attenuated the association p = 0.08)
LDL- cholesterol:-0.8(0.5), p = 1.00
%Absolute methylation change (β(SE)) LEP
Total cholesterol:-0.6(0.3), p = 0.11
Triglycerides: 0.1 (0.4), p = 0.71
HDL-cholesterol:-3.4 n(1.5), p = 0.02. (Adjustment for maternal HDL slightly attenuated the association p = 0.041)
LDL- cholesterol: -1.7 (1.5), p = 0.25
Bonferroni correction attenuated to nonsignificant estimates
TNFα methylation was not associated with duration of breastfeeding.
LEP methylation was significantly associated with duration of breastfeeding: -0.6 (95%CI -1.19, -0.01) per increment in breastfeeding duration category
Bisufite batch
Fryer (2011), UK [25] 12 (92) Plasma homocysteine (birth) Infinium Human Methylation27 BeadChip Cord blood Birth Two clusters were identified following unsupervised hierarchical clustering to identify underlying methylation β-value across samples. Plasma homocysteine was lower (p = 0.038) in cluster B. There was no difference in serum folate (estimates not presented). 298 CpGs associated with plasma homocysteine (p<0.05)
Fryer (2009), UK [88] 24 (58.3) Plasma homocysteine & serum folate (birth) LINE-1 methylation using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Correlation with LINE-1 methylation:
Cord plasma homocysteine: β = -0.69, p = 0.001 (p = 0.004 following adjustment)
Cord serum folate: β = 0.21, p = 0.34
Sex, GA, maternal age, parity, BMI, serum folate, and maternal folic acid intake
McKay (2012), UK [89] The North Cumbria Community Genetics Project 294 (48) RBS folate & serum B12 (GA 39.5 ± 1.4w) Global DNA methylation using LUMA & IGF2, IGFBP3, ZNT5 using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Methylation of the IGFBP3 locus inversely correlated with infant vitamin B12 concentration (r = -0.16, p = 0.007) Sex, GA, infant MTHFR genotype
Nafee (2009), UK** [31] 24(NR) Homocysteine (birth) LINE-1 Cord blood Birth LINE-1 methylation levels were inversely correlated with cord blood homocysteine (p = 0.01, r = -0.688)
Perng (2012), Columbia [50] BSCC 568(53.7) Erythrocyte folate, plasma vitamin B12, vitamin A ferritin (an indicator of iron status), serum zinc concentrations (5-12y) LINE-1 using pyrosequencing Blood (5-12y) LINE-1 methylation β(95%CI) & Erythrocyte Folate (nmol/L),
All ptrend = 0.51:
Q1: n = 139, ref
Q2: n = 139, -0.03(-0.18, 0.11)
Q3: n = 139, 0.01(-0.14, 0.16)
Q4: n = 139, 0.04(-0.11, 0.19)
LINE-1 methylation β(95%CI) & plasma B12 (pmol/L),
All ptrend = 0.51:
Q1: n = 137, ref
Q2: n = 136, -0.04(-0.19, 0.11)
Q3: n = 134, 0.06(-0.22, 0.09)
Q4: n = 136, -0.12(-0.28, 0.04)
LINE-1 methylation β(95%CI) & serum zinc (umol/L),
All ptrend = 0.60:
Q1: n = 140, ref
Q2: n = 142, 0.014(-0.14, 0.16)
Q3: n = 141, 0.07(-0.08, 0.23)
Q4: n = 141, 0.02(-0.14, 0.18)
Adjusted:
LINE-1 methylation β(95%CI) & plasma ferritin (ug/L),
All ptrend = 0.22:
Q1: n = 141, ref
Q2: n = 139, -0.16(-0.31, -0.01)
Q3: n = 143, -0.08(-0.24, 0.07)
Q4: n = 141, -0.13(-0.28, 0.03)
LINE-1 methylation β(95%CI) & plasma vitamin A (umol/L),
All ptrend = 0.006:
<0.700: ref
0.70–1.05: -0.07(-0.24, 0.10)
≥:1.050, -0.19(-0.36, -0.02)
Sex, vitamin A, CRP, maternal BMI, household socioeconomic position
Ba (2011), China [93] 99 (48) B-vitamin biomarkers (96% GAD 37-41w) IGF2 2 promoters using methylation-specific PCR Cord blood Birth (96% GAD 37-41w) Promoter P2: Mean change per SD of each characteristic (p):
cord blood serum folate: 0.18 (0.07)
cord blood serum vitamin B12: -0.03 (0.75)
Promoter P3: Mean change per SD of each characteristic (p):
cord blood serum folate:-0.03 (0.77)
cord blood serum vitamin B12: -0.04 (0.60)
Mother's age, maternal pregnancy BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, mother's highest education level, parity, supplementation intake during pregnancy, Newborn's birth weight and birth length, Newborn's sex and GA
Haggarty (2013), UK [81] 913 (46) RBS folate (GAD: 39.5 (95%CI: 39.4, 39.6w)) IGF2 (4 CpGs), PEG3 (7 CpGs), SNRPN (15q11, 4 CpGs) LINE-1 (4 CpGs) using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth LINE-1 methylation:
cord RBC folate 100 nmol/L: β = -0.08 (-0.12,-0.03), p = 0.001
PEG-3 methylation:
cord RBC folate 100 nmol/L: β = -0.11 (-0.16,-0.05), p<0.001
SNRPN methylation:
cord RBC folate 100 nmol/L: β = -0.002 (-0.09,0.09), p = 0.96
IGF2 methylation:
cord RBC folate 100 nmol/L: β = 0.11 (0.02,0.20), p = 0.02
Voisin (2015), Greece [99] Greek Healthy Growth Study,
Obese: 35 (68)
Normal weight: 34 (66)
24-hour recall for %energy from fat, cholesterol intake, MUFA/SFA, PUFA/SFA & MUFA+PUFA (~10y) Infinium Human Methylation27 BeadChip Blood ~10y The methylation levels of one CpG island shore and four sites were significantly correlated with total fat intake. No significance was found for cholesterol intake. The methylation levels of 2 islands, 11 island shores and 16 sites were significantly correlated with PUFA/SFA; of 9 islands, 26 island shores and 158 sites with MUFA/SFA; and of 10 islands, 40 island shores and 130 sites with (MUFA+PUFA)/SFA
Top 10 most significant CpG sites/islands (Gene, Coefficient, adjusted p:
%Energy from fat
GPS1: -0.0135, p = 0.006
TAMM41: 0.00987, p = 0.006
TAS2R13: -0.0118, p = 0.012
MZB1: 0.0145, p = 0.023
TXNIP: 0.0148, p = 0.043
MUFA/SFA:
ALDH3A2: -0.289, p = 0.00097
MYLK3: -0.238, p = 0.00363
LOC642852: 0.317, p = 0.00364
TPPP2: 0.309, p = 0.00364
RXFP2: -0.262, p = 0.00364
TMEM80: -0.245, p = 0.00364
SEMA3G: 0.28, p = 0.00388
VCAM1: -0.259, p = 0.00482
KRT73: -0.245, p = 0.00496
KRTCAP2: -0.30, p = 0.0051
PUFA/SFA
CBR1: 1.28, p = 4.02e–06
RBCK1: 0.687, p = 2.3e–05
ABHD16A: -0.302, p = 7.18e–05
KRT23: -0.326, p = 0.00536
PDE3A: -0.274, p = 0.0066
NCOA1: -0.42, p = 0.00722
PCED1A: -0.41, p = 0.00914
MRPL13: 0.308, p = 0.00914
AKR7A2: 0.237, p = 0. 00914
FAM154A:- 0.357, p = 0.0193
(MUFA+PUFA)/SFA
MRPL13: 0.186, p = 0.000952
NCOA1: -0.233, p = 0.00308
PCED1A:- 0.213, p = 0.00308
CCNA2:- 0.126, p = 0.00308
LCE1B:- 0.254, p = 0.00352
ALDH3A2: -0.176, p = 0.00352
MYLK3: -0.166, p = 0.00352
GBP7: -0.175, p = 0.00352
DGKI:- 0.178, p = 0.00352
DNTTIP: 0.148, p = 0.00352
Tanner stage, cell-type composition
De La Rocha (2016), Mexico [100] 49 (55) Serum fatty acids Global DNA methylation using total 5-methyldeoxycytosine Blood Lactating infant (89.6±68.2d) Change in %methylation per one % increase in FA
serum C20:4 (arachidonic acid): β = 0.08, p = 0.04
serum C20:5 (eicosapentaenoic acid): β = 0.099, p = 0.04
No significant associations with other fatty acids (data not shown in main paper)
Age, birth weight, normalised weight gain
Lee (2012), US [26] THREE, 141 (~47) Serum copper,(87% GAD ≥37w) NFIX, FAPGE, MSRB3 using pyrosequencing Cord blood Birth Association(95% CI) with serum copper ug/dl in cord blood:
NFIX: β = 0.13 (0.06,0.20)
RAPGE: β = -0.10 (-0.16,-0.05)
MSRB3: β = -0.15 (-0.21,-0.08)
Batch effects
Famine / Seasonality
Tobi (2015), The Netherlands [101] Dutch Hunger Winter 885 (54)
(Exposure during gestation:348,Periconceptional 74,Time-controls:160, Family-controls: 303)
Famine Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip Blood 58.9±.5y Famine vs. time-and family controls: % methylation (95%CI)
Famine in 1–10 weeks gestation (n = 73)
cg20823026 (FAM150B/TMEM18): 2.3 (1.5–3.1), p = 3.1x10-8
cg10354880 (SLC38A2):0.7(0.5,0.9), p = 5.9x10-7
cg27370573 (PPAP2C): 2.7(1.7,3.7), p = 3.6x10-7
cg11496778(OSBPL5/MRGPRG): -2.3(-3.1, -1.5), p = 2.1x10-7
Famine in 11–20 weeks gestation (n = 123): no significant cpgs
Famine in 21–30 weeks gestation (n = 143): no significant cpgs
Famine in 31- delivery (n = 128): no significant cpgs
Any exposure to famine:
cg15659713 (TACC1): 1.2(0.8,1.7), p = 2.0x10-7
cg26199857(ZNF385A): 2.0(1.3,2.7), p = 1.5x10-7
Conceived during extreme famine, but exposed for short period in gestation:
cg23989336 (TMEM105):-3.5(-4.6,-2.3), p = 1.0x10-7
Age, sex, batch effects, cell heterogeneity, smoking status, current macronutrient and micronutrient intake and SEP
Finer (2016), Bangladesh [102] 143(58) Famine (postnatal exposure 1-2y or exposure during gestation or unexposed) Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip
16 MEs: VTRNA2-1, PAX8, PRDM9, HLA-DQB2, PLD6, ZFP57, AKAP12, ATP5B, LRRC14B, SPG20, BOLA, RBM46, ZFYVE28, EXD3, PARD6G, ZNF678, ZFYVE28
Blood Postnatal exposed: 31±0.4y
Exposure during gestation:30±0.3y
Unexposed: 28±0.3y
Postnatal exposure n = 49 vs gestational exposure n = 40 vs unexposed n = 54
Genome-wide analyses
No differences between groups at 5% FDR
Targeted DNA methylation
Methylation differences between groups seen in 6/16 MEs at p<0.05, driven by gestational exposure group:: VTRNA2-1, PAX8, PRDM9, ZFP57, BOLA, EXD3
z-score for mean methylation across all 16 MEs:
gestational exposure: -0.24
postnatal exposure: -0.14
unexposed: -0.15
ANOVA p = 0.0003
Cell composition
Lumey (2012), The Netherlands [103] Dutch Hunger Winter 947 (54)
(Prenatal:350, Unexposed time controls:290, Unexposed same-sex sibling:307)
Famine LINE-1 & Sat-2 using pyrosequencing
Global methylation using LUMA
Blood Prenatal exposure group:58.9 ±0.5y
Unexposed time controls: 58.5 ±1.6y
Unexposed same-sex siblings: 57.3± 6.3y
Changes in DNA methylation (%units) in exposed vs. all non-exposed:
Global methylation:
Mean % (SD): 75.2% (4.7)
B(95% CI): -0.15 (-0.49, 0.81), p = 0.63
LINE-1 methylation % (SD):
Mean % (SD):77.1% (2.5)
B(95% CI): -0.05(-0.33, 0.22), p = 0.70
Sat2 methylation % (SD):
Mean % (SD):122.2 (56.2)
B(95% CI): -0.51 (-7.38, 6.36), p = 0.88
Age, within family clustering
Heijmans (2008), The Netherlands [104] Dutch Hunger Winter 244 (~54)
(periconceptional:60, late gestation: 62, Unexposed same-sex sibling:122)
Famine IGR2 DMR (5 CpGs) using mass spectrometry-based method Blood Periconceptional group: 58.1±0.35y
Late gestation group: 58.8± 0.4y
Controls: 57.1± 5.5y
Mean (SD) methylation in those periconceptionally exposed to famine vs. non-exposed siblings:
Average: 0.488(0.047) vs. 0.515(0.055), p = 5.9x10-5
CpG1: 0.436(0.037) vs,
0.470(0.041), p = 1.5x10-4
CpG2 and 3: 0.451(0.033) vs. 0.473(0.055), p = 8.1x10-3
CpG4: 0.577(0.114 vs. 0.591(0.112), p = 0.41
CpG5: 0.491(0.061) vs. 0.529(0.068), p = 1.4x10-3
No difference in methylation of IGF2 DMR between a subset exposed in late gestation and unexposed siblings
Age and family relations
Tobi (2014), The Netherlands [105] Dutch Hunger Winter 48 (50) Famine (early gestation) 1.2M CpGs using RRBS Blood 58.1±0.35y Genomic annotation-centred analysis of differential methylation after famine (vs. unexposed sibling), pFDR:
Genomic annotations**
Non-CGI, ‘bona fide’ promoters: 0.026
Enhancers: 0.026
DNaseI/FAIRE-seq regions: 0.036 Middle exons: 0.036
Developmental enhancers type I: 0.036
‘bona fide’ CGI shores: 0.053
Non-coding RNA: 0.053
Conserved regions: 0.053
CGI shores: 0.053
3’UTR: 0.085
Non genic CGI: 0.085
‘Bonafide’ CGI border: 0.085
Developmental enhancer type II: 0.15
CGI: 0.15
Introns: 0.15
hESC bivalent chromatin domains: 0.28
Bonafide CGI: 0.32
Cell-type specific gene promoters: 0.32
First exons: 0.36
Promoters: 0.36
HSC bivalent chromatin domains: 0.36
Imprinted promoters: 0.36
‘Bona fide’ CGI promoter: 0.37
CTCF insulators from CD4+ cells: 0.37
Imprinted DMRs: 0.37
Putative metastable epialles: 0.47
Variably methylated regions: 0.57
Promoters cancer genes: 0.63
Within the 5 annotations found to be significant, 181 DMRs were associated with prenatal famine pFDR<0.05
Tobi (2009), the Netherlands [106] Dutch Hunger Winter 244 (~54)
(periconceptional:60, late gestation:62, unexposed same-sex sibling:122)
Famine GNASAS, GNAS A/B, MEG3, KCNQ1OT1, INSIGF and GRB10, IGF2R, IL10, TNF, ABCA1, APOC1, FTO, LEP, NR3C1 and CRH using mass-spectrometry based method Blood Periconceptional group: 58.1±0.35y
Late gestation group: 58.8± 0.4y
Controls: 57.1± 5.5y
Within-pair differences divided vs sibling controls, p:
Periconceptional exposure
GNASAS: 0.24, 3.1x10-6
MEG3: 0.21, 8.0x10-3 (non-significant after Bonferroni correction)
IL10: 0.37, 1.8x10-6
ABCA1: 0.21, 8.2x10-4
LEP: 0.24, 2.9x10-3
INSIGF: -0.61, 2.3x10-5
Non-significant for all other loci
Late gestation exposure:
No associations except for reduction in GNASAS: -0.26, 1.1x10-7
Non-significant for all other loci
Family relatedness, bisulphite batch, age
Veenendaal (2012), The Netherlands [107] Dutch Hunger Winter 759 (54%)
(periconceptional:60, late gestation:62, unexposed same-sex sibling:122)
Famine PPARγ, GR1-C, PI3Kinase, LPL using PCR Blood 58±1y Methylation differences % (95%CI) for exposed vs. unexposed:
Late gestation:
GR: 0.60 (-16.39, 21.05)
LPL: 11.01 (-5.35, 30.34)
PI3Kinase: 6.18 (-42.25, 95.03)
PPARγ: -2.37 (-14.53, 11.52)
Mid-gestation
GR: -5.26 (-22.04, 15.14)
LPL: 12.08 (-5.45, 32.84)
PI3Kinase: -32.36 (-64.33, 28.27)
PPARγ: -8.70 (-20.63, 5.02)
Early gestation:
GR: 6.82 (-15.55, 35.12)
LPL: 9.20 (-10.95, 34.04)
PI3Kinase: -40.84 (-72.56, 27.38)
PPARγ:-6.76 (-21.08, 10.30)
No significant associations were found
Maternal age, sex and parity
Waterland (2010), The Gambia [108] The Keneba cohort 50 (50%)
Conceived in rainy season:25, conceived in dry season:25
Famine MEs: BOLA3, FLJ20433, PAX8, SLOTRK1, ZFYVE28 using pyrosequencing Blood Conceived in rainy season:6.61±2.73y
Conceived in dry season:7.05±2.67y
At all 5 MEs, DNA methylation was significantly higher among individuals conceived ruing the rainy season (i.e. hungry season):
BOLA3: p = 0.03
FLJ20433: p = 0.03
PAX8: p = 0.02
SLOTRK1: p = 0.006
ZFYVE28: p = 0.002
Overall: p = 0.0001
Effect sizes were NR but highlighted as being large e.g. rainy season was associated with absolute methylation increments of over 10% at PAX8 and ZFYVE28

*Studies spanning more than one exposure may appear twice in the table;

** Abstract

AA: Age acceleration; ARIES: Accessible Resource for Integrated Epigenomic Study; BMI: Body Mass Index; BSCC: Bogotá School Children Cohort; CHO: Carbohydrate; CI: Confidence Interval; CBMCs: Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells; COBRA: Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis; D: Days; DMR: Differentially Methylated Region; DA: Dizygotic; FDR: False discovery rate; FFQ: Food frequency Questionnaire; GAD: Gestational Age at Delivery; HUVEC: Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells; LUMA: Luminometric methylation assay); M: Months; MANOE: Maternal Nutrition and Offspring’s Epigenome Study; MoBA: Norwegian Moher and Child Cohort Study; MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acid; MZ: Monozygotic; NEST: Newborn Epigenetics Study; NR: Not Reported; OR: Odds Ratio; PAH: Princess Anne Hospital Study; PETS: Peri/postnatal Epigenetic Twins Study PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acid; RBC: Red Blood Cell; SD: Standard Deviation; SE: Standard Error; SEP: Socioeconomic Position; SFA: Saturated Fatty Acid; THREE: Tracking Health Related to Environmental Exposures Study; W; Weeks Y: Year