Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Psychol. 2017 Oct 12;46(1):79–94. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21917

Table 2.

Hierarchical regression analysis for demographic, neighborhood factors, and perceived violence predicting perceived safety (N = 308)

Step Variable B SE B β t R2 ΔR2 95% CI
1 .24 .24***
Race −.87 .46 −.10 −1.88 [−1.77, .04]
Gender −.33 .27 −.06 −1.20 [−.86, .21]
Social Cohesion & Trust .12** −.05 −.17 −2.79 [.04, .21]
Informal Social Control .06 .03 .11 1.91 [−.00, .11]
Aesthetic Quality .03 .04 .04 .63 [−.06, .11]
Walking Environment .13*** .03 .27 4.28 [.07, .19]
2 .34 .10***
Race −.81 .43 −.09 −1.87 [−1.65, .04]
Gender −.42 .25 −.08 −1.64 [−.92, .08]
Social Cohesion & Trust .09* .04 .12 2.03 [.00, .17]
Informal Social Control .06* .03 .11 2.10 [.00, .11]
Aesthetic Quality .00 .04 .01 .19 [−.07, .09]
Walking Environment .08** .03 .17 2.76 [.02, .14]
Perceived Violence −.27*** .04 −.35 −6.56 [−.35, −.19]
3 .34 .004
Race −.81 .43 −.09 −1.89 [−1.66, .04]
Gender .57 .75 .11 .77 [−.90, 2.04]
Social Cohesion & Trust .09* .04 .13 2.13 [.01, .17]
Informal Social Control .06* .03 .12 2.15 [.01, .11]
Aesthetic Quality .01 .04 .02 .26 [−.07, .09]
Walking Environment .08** .03 .17 2.73 [.02, .14]
Perceived Violence −.22*** .05 −.28 −4.12 [−.32, −.11]
Gender x Perceived Violence −.10 .07 −.20 −1.41 [−.25, .04]

Note. SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.