Table 5. Clinical features according to type of drainage catheter after propensity score matching (including 118 patients in each group).
c-ENBD (7-Fr) | m-ENBD (6-Fr) | ||
Variables | (n = 118) | (n = 118) | P |
Age, y (range) | 0.773 | ||
69 (45 – 83) | 69.5 (35 – 90) | ||
Gender (%) | 1.000 | ||
|
81 (68.6) | 81 (68.6) | |
|
37 (31.4) | 37 (31.4) | |
Bismuth-Corlette criteria, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
|
31 (26.3) | 31 (26.3) | |
|
87 (73.7) | 87 (73.7) | |
Pre-ENBD cholangitis (%) | 1.000 | ||
|
10 (8.5) | 10 (8.5) | |
|
108 (91.5) | 108 (91.5) | |
Pre-ENBD total serum bilirubin (%) | 0.894 | ||
|
47 (39.8) | 41 (34.7) | |
|
71 (60.2) | 77 (65.3) | |
Previous EBS (%) | 0.684 | ||
|
44 (37.3) | 41 (34.7) | |
|
74 (62.7) | 77 (65.3) | |
Previous ENBD (%) | 0.717 | ||
|
17 (14.4) | 19 (16.1) | |
|
101 (85.6) | 99 (83.9) | |
Previous EST (%) | 1.000 | ||
|
34 (28.8) | 34 (28.8) | |
|
84 (71.2) | 84 (71.2) | |
Pancreatography (%) | 1.000 | ||
|
33 (28.0) | 33 (28.0) | |
|
85 (72.0) | 85 (72.0) | |
Duration of ENBD, d (range) | 0.183 | ||
29 (2 – 95) | 33 (3 – 144) | ||
Catheter dislocation (%) | 0.308 | ||
|
3 (2.5) | 6 (5.1) | |
|
115 (97.5) | 112 (94.9) | |
Catheter impaction (%) | 0.098 | ||
|
10 (8.5) | 4 (3.4) | |
|
108 (91.5) | 114 (96.6) | |
Subsequent and/or additional drainage (%) | 0.030 | ||
|
34 (28.8) | 20 (16.9) | |
|
84 (71.2) | 98 (83.1) | |
Post-ENBD cholangitis (%) | 0.007 | ||
|
30 (25.4) | 14 (11.9) | |
|
88 (74.6) | 104 (88.1) | |
Post-ENBD pancreatitis (%) | 1.000 | ||
|
19 (16.1) | 19 (16.1) | |
|
99 (83.9) | 99 (83.9) |
ENBD, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage; c-ENBD, conventional ENBD catheter; m-ENBD, modified ENBD catheter; EBS, endoscopic biliary stenting; EST, endoscopic sphincterotomy