Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;6(8):E1020–E1030. doi: 10.1055/a-0614-2202

Table 5. Clinical features according to type of drainage catheter after propensity score matching (including 118 patients in each group).

c-ENBD (7-Fr) m-ENBD (6-Fr)
Variables (n = 118) (n = 118) P
Age, y (range) 0.773
 69 (45 – 83)  69.5 (35 – 90)
Gender (%) 1.000
  • Male

 81 (68.6)  81 (68.6)
  • Female

 37 (31.4)  37 (31.4)
Bismuth-Corlette criteria, n (%) 1.000
  • I, II

 31 (26.3)  31 (26.3)
  • III, IV

 87 (73.7)  87 (73.7)
Pre-ENBD cholangitis (%) 1.000
  • With

 10 (8.5)  10 (8.5)
  • Without

108 (91.5) 108 (91.5)
Pre-ENBD total serum bilirubin (%) 0.894
  •  ≥ 2 mg/dL

 47 (39.8)  41 (34.7)
  •  < 2 mg/dL

 71 (60.2)  77 (65.3)
Previous EBS (%) 0.684
  • With

 44 (37.3)  41 (34.7)
  • Without

 74 (62.7)  77 (65.3)
Previous ENBD (%) 0.717
  • With

 17 (14.4)  19 (16.1)
  • Without

101 (85.6)  99 (83.9)
Previous EST (%) 1.000
  • With

 34 (28.8)  34 (28.8)
  • Without

 84 (71.2)  84 (71.2)
Pancreatography (%) 1.000
  • Present

 33 (28.0)  33 (28.0)
  • Absent

 85 (72.0)  85 (72.0)
Duration of ENBD, d (range) 0.183
 29 (2 – 95)  33 (3 – 144)
Catheter dislocation (%) 0.308
  • Occurred

  3 (2.5)   6 (5.1)
  • Not occurred

115 (97.5) 112 (94.9)
Catheter impaction (%) 0.098
  • Occurred

 10 (8.5)   4 (3.4)
  • Not occurred

108 (91.5) 114 (96.6)
Subsequent and/or additional drainage (%) 0.030
  • Required

 34 (28.8)  20 (16.9)
  • Not required

 84 (71.2)  98 (83.1)
Post-ENBD cholangitis (%) 0.007
  • With

 30 (25.4)  14 (11.9)
  • Without

 88 (74.6) 104 (88.1)
Post-ENBD pancreatitis (%) 1.000
  • With

 19 (16.1)  19 (16.1)
  • Without

 99 (83.9)  99 (83.9)

ENBD, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage; c-ENBD, conventional ENBD catheter; m-ENBD, modified ENBD catheter; EBS, endoscopic biliary stenting; EST, endoscopic sphincterotomy