Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 19;13(8):1153–1161. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01520218

Table 3.

Annualized eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year) according to duration of follow-up and by CKD stage or image classification

1–5 yr Follow-Up, n=58 >5 yr Follow-Up, n=39 Reference Populations
Classification Baseline to Last Follow-Up Month 1 to Last Follow-Up Baseline to Last Follow-Up Month 1 to Last Follow-Up TEMPO 3:4 Placeboa REPRISE Placeboa
CKD stage
 1 −1.22±4.13 [8] 0.19±5.39 [8] −1.69±1.52 [10] −1.44±1.70 [10] −2.55 (−3.20 to −1.90)b [162]
 2 −1.36±2.50 [15] −1.20±2.50 [15] −2.27±1.68 [19] −2.42±1.46 [19] −3.9 (−4.42 to −3.37)b [216] −4.65 (−6.24 to −3.05)b [38]
 3 −2.80±2.11 [27] −2.72±2.02 [27] −2.09±1.39 [10] −2.02±1.29 [10] −5.36 (−6.19 to −4.53)b [84] −4.16 (−4.50 to −3.81)b [500]
 4 −3.25±0.91 [8] −3.02±1.06 [8] −4.60 (−5.09 to −4.12)b [125]
Total −2.28±2.53 [58] −1.96±2.89 [58] −2.08±1.55 [39] −1.97±1.57 [39] −3.69 [462] −3.61±0.24 [663]
Follow-up, yr 2.65±1.42 2.56±1.10 7.60±1.74 7.51±1.73 3 1
Age, yr 46±9 46±9 41±9 41±9 39±7 47±8
Men, n (%) 24 (41) 24 (41) 12 (31) 12 (31) 248 (54) 322 (49)
Irazabal image classc
 1A 0.96 [1] 2.47 [1]
 1B −1.42±3.59 [7] −1.53±2.99 [7] −1.71±1.14 [9] −1.62±1.14 [9] −1.79 (−3.08 to −0.51)b [31]
 1C −2.35±1.42 [13] −1.80±2.00 [13] −2.13±1.76 [16] −2.05±1.75 [16] −3.59 (−4.18 to −3.00)b [191]
 1D −2.98±1.73 [12] −2.59±1.70 [12] −2.26±1.27 [7] −2.16±1.30 [7] −3.89 (−4.54 to −3.24)b [161]
 1E −0.32±4.90 [5]d 0.71±6.73[5]d −2.74±1.95 [4] −2.7±1.96 [4] −4.93 (−5.87 to −3.99)b [82]
Total −2.02±2.69 [38] −1.56±3.16 [38] −2.12±1.50 [36] −2.04±1.50 [36]
Follow-up, yr 2.9±1.2 2.8±1.2 7.7±1.8 7.6±1.8 3
Age, yr 43±9 43±9 42±9 42±9 39d
Men, n (%) 15 (39) 15 (39) 12 (33) 12 (33) 248 (53)

Values are expressed as mean±SD. Numbers in brackets represent the numbers of patients. TEMPO, Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of ADPKD and Its Outcomes; REPRISE, Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD; —, not applicable.

a

eGFR data in the reference populations are reported at annualized means instead of slopes.

b

95% confidence interval.

c

Patients without baseline total kidney volume were included in the above CKD classification dataset but were not included in the image class dataset. Duration of follow-up, age, and sex are reported for each dataset.

d

One of the five patients in the 1–5 year 1E subgroup was a young patient with a relatively high baseline eGFR and a positive eGFR slope. This raised to average eGFR slope for that group (see Supplemental Figure 2).