Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;3:31. doi: 10.1038/s41541-018-0067-3

Table 1.

Fold change in the detection of four viruses by total nucleic acid extraction methods compared to QIAamp® MinElute® Virus Spin kit

Sample extraction method Detection of EBV Detection of FeLV Detection of Reo3 Detection of RSV
Invitrogen PureLink™a −1.55 1.68 7.89 2.31
QIAGEN Circulating Nucleic Acida −1.27 −2.50 −1.72 −1.32
Clonetech Nucleospin®a −15.46 −62.25 −1.18 −8.00
Invitrogen Dynabeads®b −1.02 1.22 −1.01 1.23
Perkin Elmer Chemagic™b −1.49 −2.66 −5.54 −3.39
Phenol:Chloroformc −27.86 −30.06 −7.52 −8.75
Acid phenol:chloroformc −7.94 −3.36 9.58 1.69

Sample extraction methods were assessed for their efficient extraction of four representative viruses. Silica membrane column- (a), magnetic bead- (b), and precipitation (c)-based extractions were included