Table 1.
Fold change in the detection of four viruses by total nucleic acid extraction methods compared to QIAamp® MinElute® Virus Spin kit
Sample extraction method | Detection of EBV | Detection of FeLV | Detection of Reo3 | Detection of RSV |
---|---|---|---|---|
Invitrogen PureLink™a | −1.55 | 1.68 | 7.89 | 2.31 |
QIAGEN Circulating Nucleic Acida | −1.27 | −2.50 | −1.72 | −1.32 |
Clonetech Nucleospin®a | −15.46 | −62.25 | −1.18 | −8.00 |
Invitrogen Dynabeads®b | −1.02 | 1.22 | −1.01 | 1.23 |
Perkin Elmer Chemagic™b | −1.49 | −2.66 | −5.54 | −3.39 |
Phenol:Chloroformc | −27.86 | −30.06 | −7.52 | −8.75 |
Acid phenol:chloroformc | −7.94 | −3.36 | 9.58 | 1.69 |
Sample extraction methods were assessed for their efficient extraction of four representative viruses. Silica membrane column- (a), magnetic bead- (b), and precipitation (c)-based extractions were included