Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;8:11994. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30154-w

Table 1.

Phenotypic traits evaluated in this study.

Trait Abbreviation Continuous or categorical value Number of levels Description Rate of missing value in parental population Rate of missing value in combined population
Harvest time HarT Continuous Number of days to harvest from July 1st 0 0
Fruit weight FruW Continuous Mature Fruit weight (g) 0 0
Flesh firmness FruH Continuous Magness-Taylor pressure test (lb) 0.01 0.004
Sugar content SugC Continuous Total soluble solid content of juice (%) 0.01 0.004
Acid content Aci Continuous pH of juice 0.01 0.004
Fruit skin color FruC Categorical 5 Smooth (russet formation on 0–20% of the surface area of mature fruit), smooth (20–75%), smooth (75–95%) middle (95–99%), russet (100%) (visual) 0.02 0.005
Preharvest fruit drop FruD Continuous Ratio of preharvest fruit drop (visual) 0 0
Heart rot HeaR Continuous Ratio of heart rot (visual) 0.01 0.004
Watercore WatC Continuous Ratio of watercore (visual) 0.01 0.004
Severe watercore SWatC Continuous Ratio of severe watercore (visual) 0.03
Fruit shape in longitudinal section FruS Categorical 5 Round, oblate, broad elliptical, oval, obovate (visual) 0.05
Rust Rust Categorical 4 None, a few, intermediate, many (visual) 0.07
Appearance Appear Categorical 5 Very bad, bad, intermediate, good, very good (sensory) 0.09
Groove Groove Categorical 3 None, a few, many (visual) 0.08
Resistance to black spot 1 BSR1 Categorical 3 Weak, intermediate, strong (visual) 0.02
Resistance to black spot 2 BSR2 Categorical 2 Susceptibility, resistance (visual) 0.02
Vigor of tree TreV Categorical 3 Weak, intermediate, strong (visual) 0.02
Number of spurs SpuN Categorical 3 few, intermediate, many (visual) 0.02