Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;8:11997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30091-8

Table 1.

Summary of top eight best-fitting age distributions for individual fatty acids and combined long-chain fatty acids (Comb. n-C24−32) according to RMSE.

FA σFast (yrs) σSlow (yrs) μFast (yrs) μSlow (yrs) Fast Avg. Age (yrs) Slow Avg. Age (yrs) fSlow
n-C16 5–7.5 250 0–2 0–100 4–6 199–240 0.84–0.86
n-C24 7.5 500–1250 12–15 0–1000 13–15 941–1059 0.73–0.76
n-C26 7.5–10 500–1250 15–16 0–1000 15–17 941–1028 0.80–0.84
n-C28 7.5–10 750–1500 8–9 0–1050 10–11 1167–1312 0.78–0.81
n-C30+32 12.5 750–2250 25 0–1600 26 1541–1853 0.70–0.74
Comb. n-C24−32 7.5 500–1500 15 0–1050 15 1028–1202 n-C24: 0.68–0.71
n-C26: 0.78–0.81
n-C28: 0.78–0.82
n-C30+32: 0.88–0.93
Avg. long-chain: 0.79–0.83

While each simulated fast- or slow-cycling age distribution had only a single μ and σ value, the ranges reported in the table reflect the range of individual μ and σ values that define the top eight best-fitting age distributions. The last table entry for combined long-chain fatty acids reflects the additional modeling experiment of keeping the fast and slow-cycling endmembers (μ and σ) constant for all n-C24+ fatty acids while allowing the fractional contribution to vary independently for each homologue, hence the fslow values listed for each homologue under Comb. n-C24−32.