Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 29;125(1):86–96. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01138.2017

Table 1.

Pressure-volume analysis of baseline systolic and diastolic function

CON HF HF-IT One-Way ANOVA
Systolic function
    HR, beats/min 113 ± 5 103 ± 8 106 ± 5 NS
    LVESV, ml 39 ± 7 36 ± 6 32 ± 3 NS
    LVESP, mmHg 78 ± 4 109 ± 6* 106 ± 6* P < 0.05
    LV EF, % 64 ± 3 66 ± 3 65 ± 4 NS
    LV SV, ml 66 ± 6 67 ± 4 74 ± 5 NS
    ESPVR, mmHg/ml 6 ± 1 14 ± 3 11 ± 2 NS
    PRSW, mmHg 65 ± 6 106 ± 15* 103 ± 7* P < 0.05
Diastolic function
    LVEDV, ml 105 ± 11 103 ± 9 103 ± 7 NS
    LVEDP, mmHg 7 ± 1 9 ± 2 8 ± 1 NS
    EDPVR, mmHg/ml 0.005 ± 0.001 0.012 ± 0.002* 0.016 ± 0.003* P < 0.05

Values are means ± SE; n = 5, 6, and 6 for CON, HF, and HF-IT, respectively. CON, nonsham sedentary control; HF, aortic-banded heart failure sedentary; HF-IT, aortic-banded heart failure interval exercise trained; HR, heart rate; LVESV, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume; LVESP, LV end-systolic pressure; EF, ejection fraction; SV, stroke volume; ESPVR, end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; NS, not significant.

*

Post hoc, P < 0.05 vs. CON.