Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1219–1221. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2936

Table 2.

Patient and Physician Ratings of ‘Very Good’ or ‘Excellent’ Care in Vignettes.a

Vignette Patients
(n =203)b
Physicians
(N= 151)
P value
N % (95% CI) N % (95% CI)
Headache: patient A has a headache and is worried about brain cancer, asks PCP for CT scan
Part 1: PCP does not recommend or order a CT 72 36 (29.5–42.9) 123 81 (74.3–87.3) <0.001
Part 2: PCP explains potential harms of CT radiation exposure 103 51 (44.3–58.2) 96 64 (56.7–72.1) 0.01
Part 3: patient A seeks a second opinion from a different doctor who orders a CT scan 60 30 (23.5–36.2) 8 5 (1.7–8.9) <0.001
Upper respiratory infection: patient B has a runny nose, headaches, no fever and asks PCP for antibiotics
Part 1: PCP does not prescribe antibiotics 132 66 (59.1–72.2) 143 95 (92.0–98.7) <0.001
Part 2: PCP explains American Academy of Family Physician guidelines, which do not recommend antibiotics for sinus infections 161 81 (75.0–86.0)
143 95 (91.1, 98.3) <0.001

Abbreviation: CT, computed tomography; PCP, primary care physician

a

Respondents were asked to rate care provided by the doctor in each vignette on a 5-item scale from ‘poor’ to ‘excellent’. Values reported are number and percentage rating care as ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’, except part 3 of the headache vignette, which we divided into ‘good/very good/excellent’

b

The number of respondents varied between 199 and 203 as some respondents did not answer all questions.