Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 29;2018:9067583. doi: 10.1155/2018/9067583

Table 2.

Relationship of PHG severity with demographic, clinical, and endoscopic characteristics.

Parameter Portal hypertensive gastropathy severity (n = 203) P value
Mild
(n = 149)
Severe
(n = 54)
n (%) n (%)
Sex
 Male 105 70.47 37 68.52 0.965
 Female 44 29.53 17 31.48
Child-Pugh class
 Class A 76 51.01 21 38.89 0.539
 Class B 41 27.52 25 46.29
 Class C 32 21.47 8 14.82
EV grading
 Grade 1 56 37.58 25 46.29 0.002
 Grade 2 68 45.64 13 24.07
 Grade 3 25 16.78 12 22.22
 Grade 4 0 0.00 4 7.41
EV red color sign (RC)
 RC0 (none) 84 56.38 38 70.37 0.063
 HCS (hematocystic spots) 20 13.42 0 0.00
 CRS (cherry red spots) 8 5.37 4 7.41
 RWM (red wale markings) 37 24.83 12 22.22
EV form (F)
 F1 84 56.38 29 53.70 0.973
 F2 44 29.53 16 29.63
 F3 21 14.09 9 16.67
Risk signs
 No 93 62.42 38 70.37 0.578
 Yes 56 37.58 16 29.63
EV location (L)
 LI (inferior) 96 64.43 25 46.29 0.013
 LM (medialis) 48 32.22 21 38.89
 LS (superior) 5 3.36 8 14.82
EV color (C)
 Cw (white varices) 101 67.78 41 75.93 0.535
 Cb (blue varices) 48 32.22 13 24.07
PHG mosaic pattern
 No 20 13.42 0 0.00 <0.001
 Mild 121 81.21 16 29.63
 Severe 8 5.37 38 70.37
PHG red markings
 No 121 81.21 8 14.82 <0.001
 Isolated 28 18.79 13 24.07
 Confluent 0 0.00 33 61.11
GAVE
 No 133 89.26 46 85.19 0.729
 Yes 16 10.74 8 14.81

Statistically significant at P < 0.05. EV: esophageal varices; PHG: portal hypertensive gastropathy; GAVE: gastric antral vascular ectasia.