Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb 12;197:392–399. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.007

Table 4.

Correlations among Variables

Patients with
aprosody
Patients without
aprosody
Controls
Correlations within Individual Phonetic Parameter Values across the Five Speech Tasks, Each Cell Shows the Range (Mean) of 10 Correlations
Variation in Pitch (F0) .64–.86. (.74) .75–.96 (.86) .77–.94 (.82)
Variation in Formant F1 .77–.92 (.86) .80–.94 (.87) .83–.96 (.88)
Variation in Formant F2 .45–.86 (.63) .70–.93 (.79) .68–.92 (.75)
Variation in Intensity/Loudness .36–.94 (.61) .66–.99 (.83) .53–.95 (.73)
Correlations among the Four Phonetic Parameters within the Five Speech Tasks, Each Cell Shows the Range (Mean) of 6 Correlations
Task 1 −.08–.45 (.14) .07–.80 (.32) −.06–.33 (.14)
Task 2 −.51–.38 (−.09) .18–.43 (.31) .05–.38 (.28)
Task 3 −.57–.31 (−.02) −.14–.27 (.11) .15–.50 (.37)
Task 4 −.67–.13 (−.09) .03–.75 (.27) .08–.35 (.24)
Task 5 −.53–.19 (−.01) .11–.73 (.31) .07–.45 (.25)