Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug;9(4):650–663. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.04.01

Table 2. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the IDF, NCEP ATP III and modified WHO definitions.

Variable Definition of metabolic syndromea, n (%)
IDF NCEP ATP Modified WHO
Case Control Case Control Case Control
Total 99 (70.7) 110 (39.3) 97 (69.3) 135 (48.2) 85 (60.7) 117 (41.8)
Gender
   Male 46 (46.2) 48 (43.6) 50 (51.5) 65 (48.1) 44 (51.8) 65 (55.6)
   Female 53 (53.8) 62 (56.4) 47 (48.5) 70 (51.9) 41 (48.2) 52 (44.4)
Ethnic
   Malay 40 (40.4) 45 (40.9) 35 (36.1) 49 (36.3) 31 (36.5) 40 (34.2)
   Chinese 35 (35.4) 32 (29.1) 36 (51.2) 48 (35.6) 29 (34.1) 42 (35.9)
   Indian 24 (24.2) 33 (30.0) 7 (16.3) 38 (28.1) 25 (29.4) 35 (29.9)
Age categories (years)
   30–39 2 (2.5) 4 (3.6) 5 (5.2) 7 (5.2) 4 (4.7) 4 (3.4)
   40–49 10 (10.1) 16 (14.5) 10 (10.3) 15 (11.1) 10 (11.8) 10 (8.5)
   50–59 27 (27.3) 27 (24.5) 25 (25.8) 30 (22.2) 20 (23.5) 22 (18.8)
   60–69 33 (33.3) 32 (29.1) 30 (30.9) 40 (29.6) 25 (29.4) 41 (35.0)
   >70 27 (26.8) 31 (28.2) 27 (27.8) 43 (31.9) 26 (30.6) 40 (34.2)

a, MetS were defined based on World Health Organization (WHO) (Laaksonen et al., 2002), National Cholesterol Education Program Adults Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) (Grundy et al., 2005) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria (Alberti et al., 2006) criteria.