Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 3;3(5):e000397. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000397

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of AAP-treated and ENZ-treated patients

AAP (n=46) ENZ (n=59) P values
Age, years, median (range) n=46
73 (53–90)
n=59
76 (60–92)
0.083
LDH at baseline, IU/L, median (range) n=21
226.00 (130–1207)
n=20
229.50 (170–837)
0.755
ALP at baseline, IU/L, median (range) n=37
94.00 (34–2435)
n=46
91.00 (47–4344)
0.781
PSA at baseline, ng/mL, median (range) n=46
15.56 (1.1–588)
n=59
36.00 (1.3–450)
0.605
Gleason score at initial diagnosis, n (%) 0.944
 ≤7 24 (52.2) 29 (49.2)
 ≥8 18 (39.1) 25 (42.4)
 Missing 4 (8.7) 5 (8.5)
ECOG performance score, n (%) 0.627
 0/1 41 (89.1) 49 (83.1)
 ≥2 4 (8.7) 7 (11.9)
 Missing 1 (2.2) 3 (5.1)
Any visceral metastases, n (%) 0.646
 No 40 (87.0) 53 (89.8)
 Yes 6 (13.0) 6 (10.2)
Anaemia, n (%) 0.810
 Grade ≤2 39 (84.8) 51 (86.4)
 Grade ≥3 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Missing 7 (15.2) 8 (13.6)
Opioid use at baseline, n (%) 0.694
 No 36 (78.3) 48 (81.4)
 Yes 10 (21.7) 11 (18.6)
Sedative use at baseline, n (%) 0.281
 No 39 (84.8) 54 (91.5)
 Yes 7 (15.2) 5 (8.5)

AAP, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.; ENZ, enzalutamide; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure