Table 9.
NPP,% | LPS | Tibia breaking strength, kg/cm2 | Tibia calciumb, % | Tibia phosphorusb,% | Tibia asha,% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.12 | – | 171.8 | 33.45 | 10.48e | 54.14 |
+ | 195.8 | 31.46 | 13.45d | 54.26 | |
0.40 | – | 178.7 | 35.10 | 15.26d | 52.79 |
+ | 191.2 | 36.21 | 13.93d | 55.01 | |
SEM | 7.24 | 0.78 | 0.52 | 0.52 | |
Main effect means | |||||
NPP | |||||
0.12 | 183.8 | 32.45e | 11.96e | 54.20 | |
0.40 | 184.9 | 35.65d | 14.59d | 54.02 | |
LPS | |||||
– | 175.2 | 34.27 | 12.87 | 53.54 | |
+ | 193.5 | 33.84 | 13.69 | 54.64 | |
P-value | |||||
NPP | 0.938 | 0.041 | 0.003 | 0.784 | |
LPS | 0.238 | 0.766 | 0.282 | 0.288 | |
NPP × LPS | 0.704 | 0.287 | 0.010 | 0.338 |
aResults were expressed on dry-defatted weight basis of tibia
bResults were expressed on ash weight basis of tibia
cMeans were calculated on n = 5 replicates (one laying hens per replicate) per treatment
d,eWithin comparisons, means in a column with no common superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)