Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nurses Prof Dev. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):212–218. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000462

Table 3.

Rates of Item Endorsement for the Index of Learning Styles

Dimension No. (%)a
Active-reflective
 Strong active 92 (6.59)
 Moderate active 292 (20.93)
 Weak active 428 (30.68)
 Weak reflective 381 27.31
 Moderate reflective 170 (12.19)
 Strong reflective 32 (2.29)
Sensing-intuitive
 Strong sensing 443 (31.71)
 Moderate sensing 467 (33.43)
 Weak sensing 257 (18.40)
 Weak intuitive 132 (9.45)
 Moderate intuitive 68 (4.87)
 Strong intuitive 30 (2.15)
Visual-verbal
 Strong visual 309 (22.10)
 Moderate visual 391 (27.97)
 Weak visual 344 (24.61)
 Weak verbal 238 (17.02)
 Moderate verbal 105 (7.51)
 Strong verbal 11 (0.79)
Sequential-global
 Strong sequential 134 (9.63)
 Moderate sequential 412 (29.60)
 Weak sequential 461 (33.12)
 Weak global 264 (18.97)
 Moderate global 101 (7.26)
 Strong global 20 (1.44)
a

Denominators vary depending on number of responses per category.

Dimension data from Felder & Spurlin (2005).