Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 15;7(8):3582–3591. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1622

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of time to treatment failure

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR 95% CI P‐value HR 95% CI P‐value
Treatment
Observation 1.00 .8463 1.00 .8342
R‐maintenance 1.04 (0.71, 1.51) 0.96 (0.65, 1.42)
Gender
Female 1.00 .5929 1.00 .4896
Male 1.10 (0.77, 1.57) 1.13 (0.79, 1.62)
Age
20‐59 1.00 .6018 1.00 .8259
60+ 1.10 (0.77, 1.59) 1.05 (0.70, 1.56)
Carlson comorbidity index
0 1.00 .7463 1.00 .7216
1 0.85 (0.53, 1.36) 0.83 (0.51, 1.34)
2+ 1.06 (0.63, 1.76) 1.01 (0.59, 1.71)
Ann Arbor stage
II‐III 1.00 .1597 1.00 .1159
IV 1.29 (0.91, 1.84) 1.34 (0.93, 1.91)
Practice setting
Medical center 1.00 .2115 1.00 .1337
Others 0.76 (0.50, 1.17) 0.72 (0.46, 1.11)
Induction treatment
R‐CHOP 1.00 .2173 1.00 .1107
R‐others 1.25 (0.88, 1.78) 1.36 (0.93, 1.99)
Rituximab cycles in induction treatment
4‐6 cycles 1.00 .0747 1.00 .0357a
7‐8 cycles 0.69 (0.46, 1.04) 0.64 (0.42, 0.97)

R‐maintenance, rituximab maintenance.

a

P‐value is <.05.