Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2018 Jun 12;23(11):3197–3208. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.037

Figure 5. Excitatory Synaptic Transmission Is Increased in Tsc1 KO dSPNs.

Figure 5

(A) Example traces of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) recorded from each cell type.

(B) Cumulative distribution of mEPSC amplitudes from neurons of each genotype.

(C) Mean ± SEM mEPSC amplitude per neuron for each genotype.

(D) Cumulative distribution of mEPSC inter-event intervals (IEIs) from neurons of each genotype.

(E) Mean ± SEM mEPSC frequency per neuron. *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test. For (B)–(E), n = 200 mEPSCs per neuron, dSPN WT n = 14 neurons from 10 mice, dSPN KO n = 14 neurons from 10 mice, iSPN WT n = 12 neurons from 8 mice, and iSPN KO n = 12 neurons from 8 mice.

(F) Examples of simultaneously recorded EPSCs from Tsc1 WT and KO pairs of dSPN and iSPNs evoked by intra-striatal electrical stimulation.

(G and H) Graphs displaying the EPSC amplitude recorded from pairs of Tsc1 WT and KO dSPNs (G; n = 22 pairs from 19 mice) and iSPNs (H; n = 11 pairs from 6 mice). **p < 0.01, paired t test. Filled circles with error bars indicate the group mean ± SEM.

(I) Example recordings of electrically evoked EPSCs from two stimuli delivered 50 ms apart.

(J and K) Mean ± SEM paired pulse ratio (PPR; defined as the amplitude of the second EPSC peak divided by the first) in Tsc1 WT and KO dSPNs (J; n = 21 cells from 19 mice) and iSPNs (K; n = 9 cells from 6 mice). *p < 0.05, unpaired t test.

For all panels, dots indicate the values of individual neurons. See Tables S2 and S4 for p values for statistical comparisons. See also Figure S2.