Table A2.
Attribution Status by Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) Codes, 2010
| Rural Urban Commuting Codes | Observations, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolitan Areas: core, high commuting, and low commuting |
Micropolitan Areas: core, high commuting, low commuting |
Small Towns (core, high commuting, low commuting), Rural Areas, Not Coded Areas |
||
| 1, 1.1, 2, 2.1, 3 | 4, 4.1, 5, 5.1, 6 | 7, 7.1, 7.2, 8,8.1, 8.2, 9,
10, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 99 |
||
| Attributable to Provider Groups, % | 76.0 | 12.3 | 11.6 | 100 |
| Unattributable to Provider Groups, % | 76.9 | 11.5 | 11.7 | 100 |
Notes: N=12,852,274. “Not coded areas” are more likely to be less populated rural areas. Percent may not sum exactly to one hundred due to rounding error. Considering each row separately
-
Attributable beneficiaries in metropolitan areas: 76.03%Attributable beneficiaries in micropolitan areas: 12.33%Attributable beneficiaries in small towns and rural areas: 11.64%
-
Unattributable beneficiaries in metropolitan areas: 76.86%Unattributable beneficiaries in micropolitan areas: 11.47%Unattributable beneficiaries in small towns and rural areas: 11.66%