Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):78. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0115-2

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical manifestations between MDS patients with high and low global aberrant alternative splicing (AS) score

Variables Total High aberrant AS score Low aberrant AS score P value
(n) (n) (n)
Sex a 0.024*
Male 121 87 34
Female 55 30 25
Age (year) b 69 (19–94) 66 (19–89) 73 (26–94) 0.121
≧65 102 63 39
<65 74 54 20
Laboratory data b
WBC (/μL) 3825 (490–20440) 3780 (490–20440) 4660 (1710–11690) 0.426
Hb (g/dL) 8.1 (3.5–14.6) 8.1 (3.5–13.6) 8.1 (3.7–14.6) 0.792
Platelet (×1000 /μL) 85 (3–721) 82 (9–721) 106 (3–460) 0.08
Cytogenetics a
Favorablec 115 71 44 0.09
Intermediated 23 17 6 0.382
Poore 26 20 6 0.197
Genetic alterations a
SF3B1 29 17 12 0.342
U2AF1 14 13 1 0.028*
SRSF2 24 15 9 0.675
ZRSR2 15 12 3 0.254
TET2 22 17 5 0.246
ASXL1 36 26 10 0.386
DNMT3A 25 18 7 0.517
EZH2 10 7 3 0.809
IDH1/IDH2 4 4 0 0.151
TP53 12 10 2 0.193
RUNX1 25 18 7 0.517

*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)

aNumber of patients

bMedian (range)

cFavorable cytogenetics: -Y, del(11q), Normal, del(5q), del(12p), del(20q), double including del(5q)

dIntermediate-risk cytogenetics: del(7q), +8, +19, i(17q), any other single or double independent clones

ePoor-risk cytogenetics: −7, inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q), double including −7/de(7q), complex: 3 abnormalities, complex: >3 abnormalities