Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;8:12034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30515-5

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Maximum coverage reached at each taxonomic level for methods tested in whole metagenome shotgun datasets. Panels A-C corresponds to BLAST-alignment based methods and represents coverage at (A) 1%, (B) 5%, (C) 10% error cut-offs. Panels (DF) corresponds to BLAST-independent based methods and represents coverage at (A) 1%, (B) 5%, (C) 10% error cut-offs. A coverage decrement is clear from class to family level in all the Blast-alignment based methods (AC); Clark showed the lower coverages at 1 and 5% of error thresholds (D,E).