Table 3.

Kinematic data during stance perturbation.

	Protocol 1: Stance perturbation
	Group	Δ pre/post	Pt	d	P	${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$
Amplitude [°]
hip	RBT	-0.45 ± 1.39	0.14	0.42	F(1,11) = 0.066, p = 0.802	0.006
	CBT	+0.18 ± 1.25	0.28	0.18
knee	RBT	+0.63 ± 1.49	0.05	0.51	F(1,16) = 6.368, p = 0.023	0.285
	CBT	+0.46 ± 1.11	0.04	0.47
ankle	RBT	+0.91 ± 4.26	0.20	0.25	F(1,16) = 1.493, p = 0.239	0.085
	CBT	+0.82 ± 4.06	0.20	0.27
Velocity [degrees ⋅ s-1]
hip	RBT	-6.66 ± 11.34	0.04	0.65	F(1,10) = 0.918, p = 0.360	0.084
	CBT	+1.87 ± 13.77	0.29	0.18
knee	RBT	-2.19 ± 23.29	0.35	0.16	F(1,16) = 0.180, p = 0.677	0.011
	CBT	+0.77 ± 22.22	0.44	0.05
ankle	RBT	-10.26 ± 23.71	0.06	0.52	F(1,14) = 4.627, p = 0.049	0.248
	CBT	-3.88 ± 15.72	0.17	0.25

Depicted are averaged changes of amplitude (°) and velocity (degrees ⋅ s^-1) of the ankle, knee, and hip joint excursions after perturbations during quiet monopedal stance (protocol 1). Significant changes in response to the training intervention (TTEST, P_t) with effect sizes (Cohen’s d, d) as well as time interactions (rmANOVA, P) with effect sizes (Partial Eta Squared, ${\mathit{\eta }}_{\mathit{p}}^{\mathit{2}}$ ) are illustrated in bold in the right columns with P_t and P < 0.05.