Table 5.

Kinematic data during marching in place perturbation.

	Protocol 2: Marching in place perturbation
	Group	Δ pre/post	Pt	d	P	${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$
Amplitude [°]
Hip	RBT	+0.02 ± 1.74	0.48	0.02	F(1,13) = 0.023, p = 0.881	0.002
	CBT	+0.03 ± 1.93	0.48	0.02
knee	RBT	+0.46 ± 1.39	0.09	0.34	F(1,13) = 0.087, p = 0.773	0.007
	CBT	-0.11 ± 1.17	0.36	0.09
ankle	RBT	-0.55 ± 1.35	0.06	0.43	F(1,15) = 1.729, p = 0.208	0.103
	CBT	-0.07 ± 0.94	0.39	0.05
Velocity [degrees ⋅ s-1]
Hip	RBT	-5.98 ± 12.44	0.05	0.50	F(1,13) = 1.026, p = 0.330	0.073
	CBT	-0.33 ± 15.13	0.47	0.03
knee	RBT	-5.32 ± 23.38	0.18	0.27	F(1,10) = 1.179, p = 0.303	0.105
	CBT	+2.25 ± 20.31	0.36	0.11
ankle	RBT	-12.13 ± 16.00	<0.01	0.99	F(1,14) = 6.074, p = 0.027	0.303
	CBT	-4.16 ± 13.85	0.13	0.26

Depicted are averaged changes of amplitude (°) and velocity (degrees ⋅ s^-1) of the ankle, knee, and hip joint excursions after perturbations during marching in place perturbation (protocol 2). Significant changes in response to the training intervention (TTEST, P_t) with effect sizes (Cohen’s d, d) as well as time interactions (rmANOVA, P) with effect sizes (Partial Eta Squared, ${\mathit{\eta }}_{\mathit{p}}^{\mathit{2}}$) are illustrated in bold in the right columns with P_t and P < 0.05.