Table 1.
Characteristics of commercial RDTs evaluated in this study
| Commercial name | Manufacturer (country) | Sample | Time for detection (minutes) | Sensitivity/specificity compared with ELISA reported by the manufacturers | Price (US$, per test) | CE marked | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Quantity | Sensitivity | Specificity | |||||
| SD Bioline | Standard Diagnostics Inc. (Korea) | Serum, plasma | 100 μL | 5–20 | 95.5% | 98.6% | 1.3 | No |
| Insight | Tulip Diagnostics Ltd. (India) | Serum | 100 μL | 10–15 | Not reported | Not reported | 0.5 | No |
| OneStep | AMS UK Ltd. (UK) | Serum, plasma | 75 μL | 15 | 94.9% | 99.4% | 0.7 | Yes |
ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; RDT = rapid diagnostic test.