Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 4;99(2):331–337. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0909

Table 3.

Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and proposed risk factors for participants with negative microscopy/positive PCR as compared with patients with all other results

False negative (N = 123) Other (N = 280) P value
Age in years, mean (SD) 27.0 (13.3) 29.9 (14.8) 0.069
Gender
 Male, no. (%) 91 (28.7) 226 (71.3) 0.129
 Female, no. (%) 32 (37.2) 54 (62.8)
Occupation
 Agriculture/wood extraction, no. (%) 28 (32.2) 59 (67.8) 0.402
 Gold extraction, no. (%) 15 (25.4) 44 (74.6)
 Student, no. (%) 35 (36.5) 61 (63.5)
 Others, no. (%) 45 (28) 116 (72)
Number of lesions
 One, no. (%) 86 (28) 221 (72) 0.036
 Two or more, no. (%) 36 (39.6) 55 (60.4)
Diameter of lesion in mm, mean (SD) 24.7 (19.7) 19.9 (15.2) 0.01
Previous leishmaniasis?
 Yes, no. (%) 36 (46.2) 42 (53.8) 0.001
 No, no. (%) 87 (26.8) 238 (73.2)
Duration from lesion appearance to PCR testing in months, mean (SD) 2.90 (3.05) 2.07 (2.37) 0.003
Concurrent mucosal leishmaniasis?
 Yes, no. (%) 12 (35.3) 22 (64.7) 0.528
 No, no. (%) 111 (30.1) 258 (69.9)
Concurrent bacterial infection?
 Yes, no. (%) 64 (32.5) 133 (67.5) 0.402
 No, no. (%) 59 (28.6) 147 (71.4)
Residence fumigated in past 6 months?
 Yes, no. (%) 54 (29.8) 127 (70.2) 0.939
 No, no. (%) 64 (30.2) 148 (69.8)

No. = number; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; SD = standard deviation. For categorical data, cross-tabular analyses with χ2 test of independence were used and for continuous data, independent two-sample t tests were used.