Table III.

List of stool and tissue genera significantly different between HFD and LFD groups.

				Relative abundance (%)a
Sample	Phylum	Family	Genus	HFD	LFD	κ2-valueb	P-value	Tendency in HFD compared to LFD group
Stool	Bacteroidetes	Prevotellaceae	Prevotella	19.05	4.97	4.433	0.035	↑
	Firmicutes	Aerococcaceae	Abiotrophia	1.30×10−3	0	4.302	0.038	↑
	Bacteroidetes	S24-7	unclassified	0.19	0.29	3.965	0.046	↓
	Firmicutes	Ruminococcaceae	Gemmiger	0.11	0.52	5.616	0.018	↓
	Verrucomicrobia	Verrucomicrobiaceae	Akkermansia	0.03	0.19	4.447	0.035	↓
	Actinobacteria	Micrococcaceae	Rothia	6.48×10−4	1.63×10−3	4.299	0.038	↓
Tissue	Bacteroidetes	S24-7	unclassified	0.1	0	5.033	0.025	↑
	Bacteroidetes	Bacteroidaceae	Bacteroides	12.96	29.03	5.237	0.022	↓
	Bacteroidetes	Porphyromonadaceae	Coprobacter	0	0.05	3.863	0.049	↓
	Firmicutes	Aerococcaceae	Abiotrophia	2.48×10−4	0.02	4.387	0.036	↓
	Tenericutes	Anaeroplasmataceae	Asteroleplasma	0	0.72	3.863	0.049	↓

^aRelative contribution of a genus in a group was calculated as percentage of the sequences of this genus to all sequences in this group.

^bThe κ²-values were obtained by Mann-Whitney test. HDF, high-fat diet; LFD, low-fat diet.