Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 26;7(8):602–614. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0013

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Differentially expressed genes between ivEPCs and fEPCs. (A): Hierarchical cluster showing the genes differentially expressed between ivEPCs and fEPCs. Samples are in columns, genes are in rows. Both cell populations were compared using the TAC Affymetrix software, considering a fold change of 2.0 and p < .05. (B): The volcano plot shows 438 genes differentially expressed (196 genes upregulated ‐red‐ and 242 downregulated ‐blue‐ in ivEPCs). The analysis was made using TAC Affymetrix software, considering a fold change of 2.0 and p < .05. (C): Most highly represented biologic processes/pathways that were upregulated in ivEPCs as compared to fEPCs. Functional annotation in Gene Ontology categories was made using GeneTrail2, and were classified in biological processes and KEGG categories. Abbreviation: EPCs, erythroid progenitor cells.