Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;18:139. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0598-z

Table 1.

Clinical and radiographic findings of teeth receiving RET with BC or PRF as scaffold at 1-year Follow-up

Procedure performed Preoperative variables Postoperative variables at 1-year follow-up
Radiographic findings Sign and symptom Sensitivity test
Tooth# (age/sex) Aetiology Pulp/periapical conditions Foramina development (Nolla’s stage) Periapical healing Apex closure Root elongation Dentinal wall thickening Resolution EPT/Cold test (time)
RET with a BC (average age = 11.6 y) 45 (10 y/F) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes +(6 m)
45 (12 y/M) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
45 (12 y/F) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
45 (12 y/F) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
11 (12 y/M) Tooth fracture AP 8 Yes No No No Yes
RET with PRF (average age = 11.4 y) 35 (10 y/M) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
45 (12 y/F) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes + (6 m)
35 (12 y/M) DE AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes + (9 m)
45 (14 y/F) DE AP 8 Yes No No No Yes
21 (9 y/M) Tooth fracture AP 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes + (9 m)

RET regenerative endodontic treatment, BC blood clot, PRF platelet-rich fibrin, F female, M male, DE dens evaginatus, AP apical periodontitis; +, positive; −, negative