Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;18:139. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0598-z

Table 2.

Comparative evaluation of tooth revascularization with BC and PRF in terms of clinical and radiographic findings at 1-year follow-up (* P < 0.05)

Radiographic findings at 1-year follow-up Clinical sign and symptom resolution
Procedure performed Periapical healing Apical closure Root lengthening Dentinal wall thickening
RET with a BC 5 (100%) 4 (80%) 4 (80%) 4 (80%) 5 (100%)
RET with PRF 5 (100%) 4 (80%) 4 (80%) 4 (80%) 5 (100%)