Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 14;16:142. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1119-2

Table 2.

Main results of Mendelian randomisation analysis using individual level data

Cases/controls Causal estimate (odds ratio)b (95% CI) Overall estimatec P value P het d
Scotland 1 SOCCS/GS Croatia SOCCS/LBC UK biobank
932/942 4551/8804 689/441 461/1444 3301/11382
Univariable model
 Weighted score 1.92 (0.36–10.27) 0.84 (0.44–1.62) 3.69 (0.41–33.34) 0.59 (0.09–3.99) 0.67 (0.33–1.38) 0.85 (0.55–1.33) 0.481 0.531
 Unweighted score 2.20 (0.30–16.19) 0.89 (0.41–1.93) 10.71 (0.71–161.41) 1.02 (0.11–9.84) 0.85 (0.36–1.96) 1.03 (0.61–1.73) 0.920 0.440
Multivariable modela
 Weighted score 6.85 (0.77–60.81) 0.63 (0.24–1.67) 3.82 (0.41–35.23) 0.57 (0.08–3.87) 0.87 (0.44–1.73) 1.03 (0.51–2.07) 0.931 0.227
 Unweighted score 4.70 (0.46–48.41) 0.65 (0.22–1.88) 11.21 (0.76–164.33) 0.93 (0.10–8.66) 0.81 (0.38–1.75) 1.12 (0.51–2.45) 0.785 0.222

aMultivariable regression model adjusted by age, sex and BMI for Scotland 1, SOCCS/GS and UK biobank, age and sex for Croatia, sex for LBC.MD

bChange in CRC risk per unit log-transformed 25-OHD (nmol/L)

cOverall estimates were obtained by meta-analyses under random-effect model

dPhet, P values of χ2 Q test for heterogeneity

25-OHD 25-hydroxyvitamin D, CI confidence interval, CRC colorectal cancer, GRS genetic risk score, LBC Lothian Birth Cohort, SOCCS Scotland Colorectal Cancer Study