Table 3.

Association between awareness about AMT and self-reported uptake status of household heads in 2012, Awi Zone, July 2013

Variables	Took 2012 AMT		95% Confidence Interval
	Yes	No	COR	AOR
Heard about AMT
Yes	1125	109	10.97 [5.39–22.32]	7.19 [3.27–15.82]
No	16	17	1.00
Did they Know why AMT given in free?
Yes	764	79	1.21 [0.82–1.77]	0.97 [0.63–1.48]
No	377	47	1.00	1.00
Was the treatment given to those willing to take?
Yes	1024	93	3.11 [2.0–4.83]	2.93 [1.77–4.86]
No	117	33	1.00	1.00
Did they think that the drug is beneficial for trachoma?
Yes	1100	87	12.03 [7.37–19.63]	7.33 [4.13–13.02]
No	41	39	1.00	1.00
Did they experience any side effects’ of the drug?
Yes	495	43	1.00	1.00
No	646	43	1.31 [0.84–2.02]	1.40 [0.87–2.26]
Had they got SAE of the drug?
Yes	75	8	0.78 [0.35–1.75]	0.87 [0.35–2.12]
No	419	35	1.00	1.00
Heard drug’s side effects from other Persons?
Yes	257	39	1.00	1.00
No	884	87	1.54 [1.03–2.31]	1.34 [0.78–2.32]
Did they know a person with SAE of the drug?
Yes	32	6	1.02 [0.32–3.22]	1.16 [0.24–5.57]
No	42	8	1.00
Did treatment providers provide any information?
Yes	852	40	3.39 [2.17–5.29]	2.49 [1.53–4.08]
No	289	46	1.00
Willingness to take the drug in the future
Yes	1113	91	15.29 [8.90–26.26]	5.78 [2.44–13.68]
No	28	35	1.00

SAE Serious adverse effect