Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 28;40(1):1695. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v40i1.1695

TABLE 2.

Multiple regression analyses for variables predicting depersonalisation.

Model R R2 ΔR2 SE F df1 df2 p
1a 0.26 0.07** 0.07** 5.34 7.86 1 108 0.01
2b 0.46 0.21** 0.14** 4.94 14.19 2 107 0.00
3c 0.50 0.25** 0.04* 4.83 11.79 3 106 0.00
4d 0.51 0.26** 0.01 4.83 9.06 4 105 0.00
5e 0.51 0.26** 0.01 4.83 7.46 5 104 0.00
6f 0.54 0.30** 0.03* 4.75 7.19 6 103 0.00
7g 0.58 0.33** 0.04* 4.65 7.22 7 102 0.00

Source: Authors’ own work

N = 110.

R, correlation coefficient; R2, coefficient of determination; ΔR², R squared change; SE, standard error of the estimate; F, F-ratio; Df1, degrees of freedom; Df2, degrees of freedom; P, significance.

a

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload.

b

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload, interpersonal conflict at work.

c

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload, interpersonal conflict at work, organisational constraints.

d

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload, interpersonal conflict at work, organisational constraints, age.

e

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload, interpersonal conflict at work, organisational constraints, age, death and dying-related stress.

f

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload, interpersonal conflict at work, organisational constraints, age, death and dying-related stress, HIV and AIDS stigma by association.

g

, Predictors: (Constant), Workload, interpersonal conflict at work, organisational constraints, age, death and dying-related stress, HIV and AIDS stigma by association, job status.

*

, p < 0.05;

**

, p < 0.01