Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 2;26(3):176–188. doi: 10.1108/JICA-03-2018-0023

Table II.

Common transformation programme elements

Element Pinnacle Midlands Health Network Achieving Clinical Excellence British Heart Foundation House of Care MacMillan Cancer Improvement Partnership
External facilitation A multi-disciplinary change management team included GPs, managers, analysts and patient partners One pilot funded an expert in improvement methodology to guide their approach External support was provided through the Year of Care Partnership and the Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland. Funding was used to employ project managers Three change facilitators with nursing / primary care backgrounds were recruited to support each practice
Leadership support Peer leadership networks and time for reflection was provided for GPs, nurses and practice manager leads Pilot leads had time for reflection and peer challenge within learning sets Each site identified local clinical leads to champion the new approach MacMillan GPs helped develop standards and each practice needed a clinical and non-clinical cancer champion
On-going learning Leadership development programmes were available Evaluation provided emerging insights to help shape further implementation. The Year of Care Partnership delivered training on care and support planning and also developed local trainers Opportunity for leads to meet and reflect on progress with implementation
Stakeholder engagement Patient forums and multi-disciplinary workshops are held Sharing events were held for wider GP membership Patient representatives required on national and local steering groups A patient engagement facilitator co-ordinated various engagement opportunities
Transitional funding One-off funding to provide backfill and meet additional expenses Pilots received additional per capita funding for 12 months with flexibility as to how this was used Additional funding was provided for project management/patient engagement but not backfill Practices were offered one-off incentive payments
Robust evaluation Progress reviewed regularly against baseline An external formative evaluation was commissioned An external evaluation was commissioned which also supported local evaluations by sites An external evaluation was commissioned