Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;40(1):1715. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v40i1.1715

TABLE 3.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting work stress of nurses (N = 228).

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5





B SEB β B SEB β B SEB β B SEB β B SEB β
Organisational support −0.18 0.04 - −0.31 −0.19 −0.32 −0.17 0.04 −0.29** −0.18 0.04 −0.31** −0.17 0.04 −0.30**
Self-emotion - - - - −0.16 −0.11 −0.09 0.10 −0.06 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.11 0.01
Others’ emotion - - - - - - −0.21 0.08 −0.17* −0.13 0.09 −0.11 −0.09 0.09 −0.07
Use of emotion - - - - - - - - - −0.27 0.12 −0.18* −0.17 0.13 −0.11
Regulation of emotion - - - - - - - - - - - - −0.19 0.12 −0.13
R - 0.31 - - 0.22 - - 0.36 - - 0.39 - - 0.40 -
R2 - 0.09 - - 0.11 - - 0.13 - - 0.15 - - 0.16 -
Adjusted R2 - 0.09 - - 0.10 - - 0.12 - - 0.14 - - 0.14 -
R2 Change (%) - 0.09 - - 0.01 - - 0.03 - - 0.02 - - 0.01 -
F - 24.07** - - 13.59** - - 11.42** - - 10.04** - - 8.58** -
F Change - 24.07** - - 2.91 - - 6.42* - - 5.25* - - 2.48 -

B, unstandardised coefficient; SEB, standard error of the computed value of B; β, standardised coefficient; R, correlation between observed value and the predicted value of work stress; R2, square of R; F, ratio of the mean regression.

*

, p < 0.5;

**

, p < 0.01.