Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e020419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020419

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics

Characteristics Responding general practitioners
(n=1906)
Job satisfaction
 Satisfied 1558 (81.7)
 Dissatisfied 231 (12.1)
 Do not know 47 (2.5)
 Missing 70 (3.7)
Attitude towards accreditation
 Positive 429 (22.5)
 Negative 861 (45.2)
 Neutral/do not know 616 (32.3)
Accreditation is a tool for external
control
 Agree 1558 (81.7)
 Disagree 76 (4.0)
 Neutral/do not know 234 (12.3)
 Missing 38 (2.0)
Accreditation is a tool for quality improvement
 Agree 785 (41.2)
 Disagree 565 (29.6)
 Neutral/do not know 518 (27.2)
 Missing 38 (2.0)
How do you think the accreditation process will affect your job satisfaction?
 Positively 116 (6.1)
 Negatively 1095 (57.5)
 Neutrally/do not know 632 (33.2)
 Missing 63 (3.3)
Age
 Below 45 478 (25.1)
 46–55 559 (29.3)
 56–65 749 (39.3)
 66 and above 120 (6.3)
 Mean (SD) (range) 53.3 (8.9) (33–84)
Gender
 Female 913 (47.9)
 Male 993 (52.1)
Practice type
 Shared 1309 (68.7)
 Solo practice 597 (31.3)
Region
 Capital Region of Denmark 572 (30.0)
 Central Denmark Region 473 (24.8)
 Region of North Denmark 171 (9.0)
 Region Zealand 265 (13.9)
 Region of Southern Denmark 425 (22.3)